| 答张灿校友问--讨论《二十四诗品》作者问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 祖保泉.答张灿校友问--讨论《二十四诗品》作者问题[J].安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,33(6):702-707. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 祖保泉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽师范大学文学院,安徽,芜湖,241000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 苏轼所谓“二十四韵”应解作二十四首诗,那种“唐宋人不以一首为一韵”的说法是不符合实际的。南宋陈振孙《直斋书录解题》所谓司空图“《诗格》尤非晚唐诸子所可望也”,即指《二十四诗品》。没有足够的证据,不宜断然剥夺司空图对《二十四诗品》的著作权。
|
| 关 键 词： | 二十四诗品 二十四韵 诗格 作者问题 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-2435（2005）06-0702-06 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-06-15 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年6月15日 |
A Discussion of the Author of Twenty-four Grades of Poetry |
| |
| ZU Bao-quan.A Discussion of the Author of Twenty-four Grades of Poetry[J].Journal of Anhui Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2005,33(6):702-707. |
| |
| Authors: | ZU Bao-quan |
| |
| Institution: | College of Chinese Language and Literature, ANU, Wuhu 241000,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The twenty-four rhymes of Sushi should be interpreted as twenty-four poems.Chen Zhen-sun in the southern Song Dynasty held that Poetic Style by Si Kong-tu was actually Twenty-four Grades of Poetry.Therefore,the copyright of Si Kong-tu to Twenty-four Grades of Poetry cannot be deprived of if there is no enough evidence. |
| |
| Keywords: | twenty-four grades of poetry twenty-four rhymes poetic style the author |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
