| 辽宁省级部门绩效评估模型及实证研究/FONT |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘志刚,胡税根,刘静.辽宁省级部门绩效评估模型及实证研究/FONT[J].科研管理,2011,32(1):105-110. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘志刚 胡税根 刘静 |
| |
| 作者单位： | （浙江大学 公共管理学院，浙江 杭州310005） |
| |
| 基金项目： | 辽宁省社科规划基金，辽宁省软科学计划项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： |
摘要：全面展开对特定层级、特定部门和特定项目绩效评估的研究和探索，是当前深化我国公共部门绩效评估活动的一个战略重点，也是建立符合我国国情的绩效评估体系的必经阶段和关键环节。本文运用平衡计分卡、360度反馈评价、关键绩效指标等方法和工具，构建了公共部门绩效评估指标体系。以辽宁省级部门为例，通过仅有产出的多目标DEA模型进行实证分析，证明该体系适用于我国公共部门绩效评估。同时运用数量性方法对我国当前公共部门绩效评估中存在的指标体系设定、评估主体作用和影响结果因素等方面问题进行了规律性的探讨，提出了设定科学的评估标准、发挥外部评估作用和增强评估结果客观公正性三个方面的结论和建议。
|
| 关 键 词： | 绩效评估 省级部门 数据包络分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 2010-01-01 |
| 修稿时间： | 2010-09-01 |
The performance evaluation model and its demonstration of Liaoning provincial department |
| |
| Liu Zhigang,Hu Shuigen,Liu Jing.The performance evaluation model and its demonstration of Liaoning provincial department[J].Science Research Management,2011,32(1):105-110. |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Zhigang Hu Shuigen Liu Jing |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 31002, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract: Research and exploration of performance evaluation at specific levels, departments and projects in all round way is a strategic focus for deepening the performance evaluation of public sectors in China, which is also the necessary and crucial stage for establishing the performance evaluation system based on China’s current national conditions. With the methods of balance score card, 360－degree feedback assessment, key performance indicators and others, the index system for public sectors performance evaluation is built. And by taking Liaoning provincial department as an example, the only output multi-objective analysis of DEA model is used to empirically prove that the system is suitable for China’s public sectors performance assessment. At the same time, quantitative methods are employed to discuss many problems, which exist regularly in current public sectors performance evaluation, such as the index system settings, the role of evaluation main body, and the factors affecting the results. In conclusions and recommendations, three points are emphasized, that is, setting scientific standards for assessment, playing the role of external evaluation, and enhancing the objectivity of the assessment results. |
| |
| Keywords: | performance evaluation provincial department DEA |
| 本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
