| 传统完形填空与C-试题的效度对比研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张玲,韩慧.传统完形填空与C-试题的效度对比研究[J].新疆教育学院学报,2005,21(3):63-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张玲 韩慧 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 浙江财经学院外语学院
2. 新疆教育学院语言分院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830043 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过定性和定量研究，分析传统完形填空中的定距删词和C—试题在中国英语考试中的效度。对比研究发现，在试题的编写、评分和信度方面，C—试题优于传统完形填空，它简单、经济、客观、信度高。传统完形填空则在效度方面高于C—试题，建议将其作为一种替换题型用于综合英语能力考试中。C—试题可作为一种词汇练习形式用于课堂练习或词汇测试中。
|
| 关 键 词： | 完形填空 C—试题 效度 信度 对比 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-3588(2005)03-0063-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 05 8 2005 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年5月8日 |
The Comparative Study of the Validation between the Classical Cloze Test and C-Test |
| |
| Zhang Ling,Han Hui.The Comparative Study of the Validation between the Classical Cloze Test and C-Test[J].Journal of Xinjiang Education Institute,2005,21(3):63-66. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Ling Han Hui |
| |
| Institution: | School of Foreign Languages, Zhejiang College of Finance and Economics School of languages, Xinjiang Education Institute, Urumqi 830043 ,Xinjiang |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper aims to make a comjparative study of the validation between the classical cloze test and the C-test.It centers on three aspects:1,which cloze format is superior in terms of its constructing and scoring method and reliability?2,as pragmatic test format,which cloze format has more contentcoverage to measure a candidate' s abilities,including linuistic and non-linguistic aspects?3,which cloze format could provide more information to predict a candidate' s actual performance in language learming?The study shows that C-test could be adopted in vocabulary practice,while the classical test could be used in pragmatic language test. |
| |
| Keywords: | cloze test C- test validity reliability comparative study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
