|
|||||
|
|
In Defence of Critical Thinking as a Subject: if McPeck is wrong he is wrong |
|
| Authors: | VICTOR QUINN |
| Abstract: | This paper attempts three things. It invites you to engage critically with me in the adjudication of a particular controversy. It attempts to argue for and exemplify important procedures which distinguish good and bad thinking in a critical mode. And it argues the case for the separate teaching of critical thinking (henceforth CT). |
| Keywords: | |