Uses and abuses of statistical significance tests and other statistical resources: a comparative study |
| |
Authors: | Hector Monterde-i-Bort Dolores Frías-Navarro Juan Pascual-Llobell |
| |
Institution: | 1. Faculty of Psychology, Department of Methodology of the Behavioural Sciences, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain 2. Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Valencia, Avenida Blasco Ibá?ez, 21, Valencia, Spain
|
| |
Abstract: | The empirical study we present here deals with a pedagogical issue that has not been thoroughly explored up until now in our
field. Previous empirical studies in other sectors have identified the opinions of researchers about this topic, showing that
completely unacceptable interpretations have been made of significance tests and other statistical resources. We tried to
show the degree to which these errors of interpretation appear in a sample of university professors and researchers. To evaluate
the beliefs and opinions of the university professors about certain methodological and statistical questions, we adapted the
"Psychometrics Group Instrument" questionnaire by Mittag (1999) and Mittag and Thompson (Educational Researcher 29:14-20, 2000). We specifically wanted to detect opinions about: (1) avoiding inappropriate interpretations, (2) rectifying incorrect uses,
(3) creating a debate on possible alternatives, and (4) proposing editorial changes in the publication criteria. In this study,
we compare the results we obtained with those obtained by two other equivalent studies (Gordon, Journal of Vocational Educational
Research 26:1-18, 2001; Mittag and Thompson, Educational Researcher 29:14-20, 2000). The characteristics of the sample and the scope of the results are described, and a critical reflection is carried out
on typical misunderstandings in interpretation that show a worrisome lack of understanding of some basic methodological and
statistical concepts. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|