| 《高等学校学术委员会规程》的突破与展望：文本分析的视角 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 汪洋,龚怡祖.《高等学校学术委员会规程》的突破与展望：文本分析的视角[J].复旦教育论坛,2014,12(5):64-69. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 汪洋 龚怡祖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京农业大学 公共管理学院,江苏 南京,210095 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目“大学内部权力治理
结构研究———基于委托代理理论的分析视角”（13YJC880073）;国家
社会科学基金项目“完善中国特色现代大学制度研究”
（12CGL090）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《高等学校学术委员会规程》的颁布,对于完善大学内部治理结构无疑是利好消息。对比《高等学校学术委员会规程》征求意见稿与正式公布稿的文本内容,不难发现两者之间有所区别,具体表现在规范表述、修订表述、增补表述三个方面。与征求意见稿相比,正式公布稿在诸多方面有所突破,但也存在一些不足。这促使我们在正式公布稿的实施和未来修订中,需要进一步厘清学术委员会权力的内涵与边界、理顺学术治理结构的内部关系、强化学术权力的规制机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术委员会 学术权力 行政权力 学术治理结构 |
Breakthrough and Outlook of "University Academic Committee Regulations":
The Perspective of Text Analysis |
| |
| WANG Yang and GONG Yi-zu.Breakthrough and Outlook of "University Academic Committee Regulations":
The Perspective of Text Analysis[J].Fudan Education Forum,2014,12(5):64-69. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Yang and GONG Yi-zu |
| |
| Institution: | College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University;College of Public Administration, Nanjing Agricultural University |
| |
| Abstract: | The Promulgation of "University Academic Committee Regulations" is undoubtedly good news for
the improvement of university governance structure. Through a comparative analysis between the draft and
official text, the authors summarize differences in terms of norm, amendment and supplement. Compared with the
draft, the official text reflects breakthroughs in many aspects, but there are also some drawbacks. It is imperative
to further clarify the connotation and border of academic committee's power, rationalize the internal relationship
of academic governance structure, and strengthen the restrictive mechanism of academic power in the
implementation and revision of the regulations in the future. |
| |
| Keywords: | Academic Committee Academic Power Administrative Power Academic Governance Structure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《复旦教育论坛》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《复旦教育论坛》下载免费的PDF全文 |
