| 新世纪文学家的失约与失信 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谭光辉.新世纪文学家的失约与失信[J].海南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,20(4):60-64. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谭光辉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川师范大学,文学院,四川,成都,601168 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文学作为一种话语权,最早被视为神意的表达,因此文学家的委托人是神。启蒙主义兴起之后,文学是民意的表达,因此文学家的委托人是人民,文学成为文学家与人民之间的一种契约。但是由于委托人的身份不明和在权力转赠过程中的被遗忘造成了委托人的死亡,致使新世纪文学家将话语权向政治、金钱、自身寻租,从而造成了文学家对人民的失约。文学家的失约导致了失信,使文学面临着遭公众讨伐的厄运,也造成了文学日益边缘化的现实,新世纪文学只有依托守约的文学家才能改变这种现状。
|
| 关 键 词： | “文学契约论” 新世纪文学 失约 失信 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-223X(2007)-04-0060-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年4月28日 |
Writers' Breach of Appointments and Promises in the New Century |
| |
| Authors: | TAN Guang-hui |
| |
| Abstract: | Literature,as a discourse right,was first considered the expression of Providence,and thus God was assumed as the trustor of writers.After the rise of the Enlightenment,however,literature became the outlet of popular will,so the people came to be the trustor of writers and literature turned into a contract between writers and the people.Nevertheless,due to the dubious identity of trustors and their death caused by the forgetfulness of trustors during power shift,writers in the new century were impelled to subject the discourse power to politics,money and themselves,thus having led to writers' breach of appointments to the people.Consequently,writers' breach of appointments has resulted in their breach of promises,which has caused literature to come under the severe attack of the public and to the grim reality of being increasingly marginalized.It is only by relying on those writers loyal to their promises can literature stand chances of transforming this grim situation. |
| |
| Keywords: | "On the contract of literature" literature in the new century the breach of appointments the breach of promises |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
