| 文学史编写的“新”与“全”辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 牟泽雄.文学史编写的“新”与“全”辨析[J].昆明师范高等专科学校学报,2008,30(3):93-95. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 牟泽雄 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 昆明学院初等教育系,云南昆明650202 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 一味求“新”与求“全”并不就能解决文学史编写的问题，它可以在有限的范围内修修补补，但它无法完成“重写文学史”的最初设想与最终使命。如果对文学史编写的理论上（史学观念与方法以及对“中国”文学的认识与整合）缺少突破，文学史编写的实践就不可能达到我们所设想的目标。“重写”将会是在一个较低的层面不断重复的过程。要编写出高水准的文学史，有待于提高对文学史书写中基本问题的认识，有待于寻找更多的写作的可能性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 中国文学史 文学史编写 理论突破 新颖 残缺 |
"The New" and "Entire" Problem Discrimination in Compiling and Composing of Literature History |
| |
| MOU Ze-xiong."The New" and "Entire" Problem Discrimination in Compiling and Composing of Literature History[J].Journal of Kunming Teachers College,2008,30(3):93-95. |
| |
| Authors: | MOU Ze-xiong |
| |
| Institution: | MOU Ze-xiong (Elementary Education Department, Kunming University, Yunnan Kunming 650202,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Seeking the ＂new＂ and ＂entire＂ cannot be likely to resolve the problem in compiling and composing of literature history. Perhaps it can make some minor changes within limited range, but it has no way to accomplish initial tentative plan and ultimate mission on ＂rewriting history of literature＂. If compiling and composing literature history is short of breakthrough theoretically, with method and the cognition to ＂Chinese literature＂, the writing practice with history of literature isn＇t likely to reach the target assumed by us. ＂Rewriting＂ will be process repeat unceasingly in a lower standard. To improve standard of literature history writing, We need to improve the cognition of fundamental problem to literature history writing and to seek more writing possibility. |
| |
| Keywords: | history of Chinese literature writing of literature history theory breakthrough new defective |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
