| Abstract: | Oral reading errors were collected from two young beginning readers (6 years old) as they read to their class teacher throughout a school year. The data were collected from the naturalistic setting of an infant classroom. The errors of substitution were analysed for graphophonic, syntactic and semantic similarity and examined to determine whether the observed response was a previously read word. The study demonstrated that the two boys frequently used a previously read word as a substitution although there was less reliance upon this source towards the end of the year. The graphophonic cue system was used throughout the year, with first letter similarity particularly in evidence. However, finer discriminations over time were also noted. The contextual constraints of syntax and semantics were in evidence throughout the year and the use of these cues had increased by the end of the year. The evidence from this in–depth case study was used to question previously postulated developmental phases of reading. |
