| 浅论唐,明两代宦官专权的不同 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郗鹏.浅论唐,明两代宦官专权的不同[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,32(4):55-57. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郗鹏 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 云南师范大学历史系云南昆明 650092 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 唐后斯的阉寺之权在皇权之下，明代中后期的阉兰之权则在皇权之下。这一迥然差异的表层原因在于阉寺是否握有兵权，而其深层原因则在干两代的军事制度截然不同。
|
| 关 键 词： | 皇权 宦官 军权 军事制度 唐朝 明朝 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5110(2000)04-0055-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999年11月22 |
An essay about the dicrepancy of eunuchs' monopolizing power in the Tang and Ming dynasties |
| |
| XI Peng.An essay about the dicrepancy of eunuchs' monopolizing power in the Tang and Ming dynasties[J].Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2000,32(4):55-57. |
| |
| Authors: | XI Peng |
| |
| Abstract: | Emperors were under the control of senior eunuchs in the late period of the Tang Dynasty,but emperors could firmly control senio reunuchs in the middle and late periods of the Ming Dynasty.The surface difference of the facts is whether the eunuchs had controls over military power, but the deep difference lies in the military systems of the two dynasties. |
| |
| Keywords: | imperial power eunuch military power military system centralize |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
