| 新世纪以来芬兰基础教育课程改革及其启示 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 和学新,杨静.新世纪以来芬兰基础教育课程改革及其启示[J].当代教育与文化,2014(2):41-49. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 和学新 杨静 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 天津师范大学 教育科学学院,天津300387 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 21世纪芬兰经济快速发展,产业结构发生变化,第三产业比重持续上升并成为国民经济的主导产业,加上社会经济与科技的进步,芬兰政府意识到改革基础教育课程的重要性。芬兰在课程理念、课程内容、课程管理、课程设置、师资建设等方面都进行了改革。具体包括:尊重天性,培养终身学习的能力;重视科技与外语课程;课程管理分散灵活,实行"不分年级制";增加课程设置的弹性;整治教师队伍,为课程改革提供师资保证;政府为基础教育课程改革提供财力保障。改革虽然取得了一定的成果,但是其中也存在一些问题,例如,忽视学生学习自觉性的引导,对性别造成的学习差异不够重视,缺乏统一客观的课程评价标准等。芬兰基础教育课程改革的经验与教训启示我们:要注重课程设置的公平性;增加课程设置的弹性;提高师资队伍质量,使其具备配合国家课程改革的综合素质;建立全面而严格的基础教育课程改革评估制度;为学生提供多样化的选课方案以及课程指导制度。
|
| 关 键 词： | 新世纪 芬兰基础教育 课程改革 |
T he Basic Education Curriculum Reform in Finland in the New Century and Its Implication for China |
| |
| HE Xue-xin,YANG Jing.T he Basic Education Curriculum Reform in Finland in the New Century and Its Implication for China[J].Contemporary Education and Culture,2014(2):41-49. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Xue-xin YANG Jing |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Education Sciience, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300387, PRC) |
| |
| Abstract: | In the twenty-first Century , the economy of Finland has been developing rapidly and its industrial structure has changed . The proportion of the third industry continues to rise and becomes the leading industry of the national economy . What＆#39;s more , the great progresses have been made in economy , science and technology . In such a context , Finland government realized the importance of the basic education curriculum reform , and launched the reform in basic education to innovate the ideas , contents , management , and setup of curriculum , and to strengthen the teaching staff construction as well . To be more specific , the following new ideas and measures are put forward or taken ：showing respect for human nature and cultivating the ability of lifelong learning , attaching importance to science and technology and foreign language curriculum , adopting decentralized and flexible management of curriculum , impplementing ‘non-graded school system’ , increasing the flexibility of curriculum setting , building teachers＆#39;team to guarantee the quality and quantity of teachers for the curriculum reform , and government＆#39;s providing financial support for the reform . Despite the great achievement , there are still some problems . For example ,insufficient guidance provided for developing students＆#39;autonomic learning , not much attention paid to the differences in learning outcome caused by gender difference ,lack of unified and objective standard for curriculum evaluation . Lessons can be drawn from the Finnish experience for us as follows . Attention must be paid to the fairness in setting up curriculum . The flexibility of curriculum set-up should be increased . The quality of teachers needs to be enhanced to meet the ability requirements of the national curriculum reform . A comprehensive and rigorous basic evaluation system is to be established for basic education curriculum reform ;Diversified options and guidance for course selection should be provided for students . |
| |
| Keywords: | the new century basic education in Finland curriculum reform |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
