| 从票据抗辩限制看票据无因性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郝慜.从票据抗辩限制看票据无因性[J].昆明大学学报,2007,18(A01):33-36. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郝慜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国劳动关系学院法学系,北京100037 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 票据抗辩制度是对票据的安全性的保证，却对票据的更根本的作用一流通一产生限制。要找到两者的平衡点就需要对票据抗辩进行必要的限制，从而保证票据的流通。票据无因性也正是由这里体现出来的。票据抗辩限制不应该适用于直接当事人之间。票据抗辩限制的例外情况并不否认票据无因性，因为在那些情况下对安全性的要求超过了对流通性的要求。
|
| 关 键 词： | 票据抗辩 票据抗辩限制 票据无因性 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-2056（2007）（S1）-0033-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2007-10-11 |
Discovering the Abstraction of Negotiable Instrument from the Limitation of Counterpleas in Negotiable Instrument |
| |
| HAO Min.Discovering the Abstraction of Negotiable Instrument from the Limitation of Counterpleas in Negotiable Instrument[J].Journal of Kunming University,2007,18(A01):33-36. |
| |
| Authors: | HAO Min |
| |
| Abstract: | The institution of counterpleas in negotiable instrument is the guarantee of the security of using negotiable instnunent , but it limits the more important function of negotiable irculation. In order to find out the balance between these two issues and ensure the circulation of the negotiable instrument, it is necessary to limit counterpleas in negotiable instrument. However, the limitation of counterpleas in negotiable instrument should not be applied in the relations between the direct clients. In addition, the exceptions of the institution of the limitation of counterpleas in negotiable instrument do not deny the existence of the abstraction of negotiable instru ment, because under those cases the need of security has surpassed that of circulation. |
| |
| Keywords: | counterpleas in negotiable instrument the abstraction of negotiable instrument limitation of counterpleas in negotiable instrument |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
