| 《倚天屠龙记》与《鹤惊昆仑》之比较——兼及“现代文学史观” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐斯年.《倚天屠龙记》与《鹤惊昆仑》之比较——兼及“现代文学史观”[J].苏州教育学院学报,2012(1):2-11. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐斯年 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 苏州大学出版社 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 金庸的《倚天屠龙记》和王度庐的《鹤惊昆仑》都写身怀血仇的少年,通过"复仇—消解复仇"而成长为一代大侠的故事。尽管金庸成就更高,但是他与前辈作家在观念和美学追求方面都存在性质相同、相似之处。因此,把后者"定性"为"民国旧派"是一个不准确、不科学的概念。应以"多元共生"的现代文学史观取代二元对立的"斗争史观"。
|
| 关 键 词： | 金庸 《倚天屠龙记》 王度庐 《鹤惊昆仑》 武侠小说 中国现代文学 |
A Comparison of Heaven Sword & Dragon Saber and Crane over Kunlun:With a Discussion of the "Modern Notion of Literary History" |
| |
| Authors: | XU Si-nian |
| |
| Institution: | XU Si-nian (Suzhou University Press,Soochow University,Suzhou 215021,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Suffering from feud violence during their childhood,protagonists in both Jin Yong’s Heaven Sword & Dragon Saber and Wang Dulu’s Crane over Kunlun became great swordsmen by undergoing "vengeance—resolving vengeance".Despite Jin Yong’s prominent achievements,he shares with the predecessors the same or similar notions and aesthetic pursuits in novel writing.Therefore,it is inaccurate and unreasonable to "define" the writers before Jin as the "has-beens of the Republic of China".The "literary history notion of conflicts" based on binary opposition should be replaced by the modern literary history notion based on "multi-paragenesis". |
| |
| Keywords: | Jin Yong Heaven Sword & Dragon Saber Wang Dulu Crane over Kunlun Kung-fu Novels Chinese modern literature |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
