| 从语法角度看敦煌本《搜神记》与变文年代的区别 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张薇薇.从语法角度看敦煌本《搜神记》与变文年代的区别[J].阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版),2009(3):69-72. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张薇薇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 阜阳师范学院文学院,安徽卓阳,236041 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 题名为《搜神记》的小说我们目前可以看到的大致有三个版本：二十卷本，八卷本和敦煌本。前两个版本，历代研究成果颇丰，而对于敦煌本，或许是仅存一卷的缘故，历来鲜有问津，基本上都是依附于敦煌变文之后，没有独立的定位。文章从语法这一角度，选取几个颇有代表性的代词、介词，旨在说明敦煌本《搜神记》的年代在变文（一般认为是晚唐五代）之前，其内在语言风格统一，反映的大致是中唐以前的语言面貌。
|
| 关 键 词： | 搜神记 敦煌本 变文 年代 区别 |
FROM THE GRAMMAR TO RESEARCH THE DIFFERENT EAR BETWEEN THE SOUSHENJI OF DUNHUHANG COPY'S AND BIANWEN'S |
| |
| Zhang Wei-wei.FROM THE GRAMMAR TO RESEARCH THE DIFFERENT EAR BETWEEN THE SOUSHENJI OF DUNHUHANG COPY'S AND BIANWEN'S[J].Journal of Fuyang Teachers College(Social Science Edition),2009(3):69-72. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Wei-wei |
| |
| Institution: | School of Literature;Fuyang Teachers College;Fuyang;236041 |
| |
| Abstract: | About the soushenji, we can see three copies today. Namely: twenty, eight(baihaiben) and dunhuang (goudaoxingben) copy. Twenty copy and eight copy, we can see a lot of researches. But about the Dunhuang copy, perhaps because of only one volume, no one has ever research, basically dependent on Dunhuang Bianwen,has the lack of an independent position. The Article from the perspective of grammar, quite a few select representative pronoun, preposition, Seeks to clarify that the era of Dunhuang soushenji is befo... |
| |
| Keywords: | soushenji Dunhuang copy Bianwen ear difference |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
