| 从“中国模式”到“中国体验”：高等教育学发展的范式重构 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李海龙.从“中国模式”到“中国体验”：高等教育学发展的范式重构[J].复旦教育论坛,2021,19(4):5-11. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李海龙 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 扬州大学 教育科学学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省教育科学“十三五”规划2018年度课题重点资助项目“‘双一流’背景下高校学科调整的制度生成机制研究”（B-a/2018/01/01） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在学科发展过程中,中国的高等教育学有一种将学术研究贴上国家标签的符号诉求。预设“国家语境”、提炼“中国经验”并形成可推广的“中国模式”便成为学科建设的主要方向。遗憾的是,高等教育学在寻找“中国模式”的过程中一直使用他者视角,其本土化历程没有离开“精英主义”取向,并造成了知识生产的内卷化。学科需要从高等教育与社会的互动中记录更全景化的“中国体验”,更需要将自身作为方法,重获“第一原理”。
|
| 关 键 词： | “中国模式” “中国体验” 高等教育研究 高等教育学 范式 |
From "Chinese Model" to "Chinese Experience":
Reconstruction of the Paradigm for the Development of Higher Education |
| |
| LI Hailong.From "Chinese Model" to "Chinese Experience":
Reconstruction of the Paradigm for the Development of Higher Education[J].Fudan Education Forum,2021,19(4):5-11. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Hailong |
| |
| Institution: | School of Educational Sciences, Yangzhou University |
| |
| Abstract: | In the process of disciplinary development, Chinese higher education has a symbolic appeal to attach a national label to academic research. Presupposing the "national context", refining "Chinese experience" and forming a generalizable "Chinese model" has become the main direction of discipline construction. Regrettably, higher education has always used the perspective of the other in its search for the "Chinese model", and its localization process has not departed from the "elitism" orientation, which has caused the involution of knowledge production. The discipline needs to record a more panoramic "Chinese experience" from the interaction between higher education and society, and it needs to use itself as a method to regain the "first principles". |
| |
| Keywords: | "Chinese Model" "Chinese Experience" higher education research higher education paradigm |
|
| 点击此处可从《复旦教育论坛》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《复旦教育论坛》下载免费的PDF全文 |
