| 陈衍“三元说”与沈曾植“三关说”之理论差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马卫中.陈衍“三元说”与沈曾植“三关说”之理论差异[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,37(1):42-46. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马卫中 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 苏州大学,文学院,江苏,苏州,215123 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 陈衍和沈曾植均为近代同光体之代表诗人。作为同光体的理论家,陈衍最重要的诗学主张就是所谓"三元说",即学诗应该以盛唐开元、中唐元和、北宋元祐诗人为楷模。然沈曾植在与陈衍论诗、得悉陈衍"三元说"内涵并为之诠释后,又提出"三关说",即学诗应该打通"三关":宋之元祐、唐之元和、晋之元嘉。过去讨论同光体,着重在其成员创作和理论的共性特点,对其间所存在的差异,论述不多。其实,作为近代人员最多、影响最大的诗歌流派,其内部无论创作,还是理论,都有差异,尽管他们都集结在学宋的大旗之下。陈衍"三元说"与沈曾植"三关说"的差异,首先是学习的对象不同,"三元说"有开元,而"三关说"将其易为元嘉;其次是学习的时序不同,"三元说"是顺下,"三关说"是逆上;再次是学习的内容不同,"三元说"仅局限在诗歌的范围内,而"三关说"则将写诗之功夫,拓展到儒学、玄学和佛学,即学术的范畴,同时,又与时代之现实内容挂钩。
|
| 关 键 词： | 陈衍 沈曾植 三元说 三关说 同光体 理论差异 |
The Theoretic Differences between Chen Yan's Views of San-yuan and Shen Ceng-zhi's View's of San-guan |
| |
| MA Wei-zhong.The Theoretic Differences between Chen Yan's Views of San-yuan and Shen Ceng-zhi's View's of San-guan[J].Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2011,37(1):42-46. |
| |
| Authors: | MA Wei-zhong |
| |
| Institution: | MA Wei-zhong(Soochow University,School of Liberal Arts) |
| |
| Abstract: | Chen Yan and Shen Ceng-zhi both were the representative poets of Tongguang Style in the history of modern poetry.As the theorist of Tongguang Style,Chen Yan's important theory,Views of San-yuan is learning poetry should take the poets of Kaiyuan,Yuanhe,and Yuanyou as models.Shen Ceng-zhi,after knowing the connotation of Views of San-yuan,proposed views of San-guan,which is learning poetry should get through three passes of Yuanyou,Yuanhe,and Yuanjia.In the past,researches into Tongguang Style were focused o... |
| |
| Keywords: | Chen Yan Shen Ceng-zhi views of san-yuan views of san-guan Tongguang Style theoretic difference |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
