首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于DEA窗口模型的中国碳减排技术研发效率评估
引用本文:周喜君,郭丕斌.基于DEA窗口模型的中国碳减排技术研发效率评估[J].科技管理研究,2021,41(1):187-193.
作者姓名:周喜君  郭丕斌
作者单位:忻州师范学院经管系,山西忻州034000;太原师范学院经济系,山西晋中030619
基金项目:]国家自然科学(71874119);教育部人文社科项目(17YJA630025);山西省软科学项目(2017042017;2019041005-1);山西省高校哲学社会科学项目(2019W144)。[
摘    要:通过评价我国碳减排技术研发效率,探索促进二氧化碳减排的可行技术路径。基于不同的技术减排机理,将碳减排技术分为能源生产技术和能源利用技术,并利用DEA窗口模型对2005一2017年的碳减排技术研发效率进行了评估。结果发现,(1)研究期内,能源生产技术研发效率总体上没有取得进步,基本上维持在0.77左右,能源利用技术的研发效率有明显提升,从0.58.上升到0.78。(2)不管是能源生产技术还是能源利用技术,纯技术效率达到有效的年份都很少,表明研发资源配置不合理、管理效率低是造成部分年份能源生产技术和能源利用技术研发效率偏低或波动的主要原因。(3)能源生产技术方面,纯技术效率、规模效率最低的是煤炭开采和洗选业;能源利用技术方面,纯技术效率、规模效率最低的是黑色金属冶炼和压延加工业。因此,我国应加大煤炭清洁生产技术研发投入和加快钢铁等高耗能、高排放产业领域落后产能的淘汰力度。

关 键 词:碳减排  能源生产技术  能源利用技术  DEA窗口模型  研发效率
收稿时间:2020/4/4 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/4/22 0:00:00

Evaluation of China's carbon emission reduction technology R & D efficiency based on DEA window model
Zhou Xijun,Guo Pibin.Evaluation of China''s carbon emission reduction technology R & D efficiency based on DEA window model[J].Science and Technology Management Research,2021,41(1):187-193.
Authors:Zhou Xijun  Guo Pibin
Institution:(Department of Economics and Management,Xinzhou Teachers University,Xinzhou 034000,China;Department of Economics,Taiyuan Normal University,Jjinzhong 030619,China)
Abstract:The purpose of this article is to explore feasible technological paths to promote carbon dioxide emission reduction by evaluating the efficiency of China''s carbon emission reduction technology research and development. Based on different technical emission reduction mechanisms, this paper divides carbon emission reduction technology into energy production technology and energy utilization technology, and uses the DEA window model to evaluate the carbon emission reduction technology research and development efficiency from 2005 to 2017. The results found that: (1) During the study period, the R & D efficiency of energy production technology did not generally improve, and basically remained at about 0.77, and the R & D efficiency of energy utilization technology improved significantly, from 0.575 to 0.781. (2) Regardless of whether it is energy production technology or energy utilization technology, there are very few years when the pure technical efficiency reaches the effective level, indicating that the unreasonable allocation of R & D resources and low management efficiency have caused the low R & D efficiency of energy production technology and energy utilization technology in some years The main cause of fluctuations. (3) In terms of energy production technology, the lowest pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency are in the coal mining and washing industry; in the energy utilization technology, the lowest pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency are in the ferrous metal smelting and rolling processing industry. Therefore, China should increase investment in clean coal production technology research and development and accelerate the elimination of backward production capacity in high energy-consuming and high-emission industries such as steel.
Keywords:carbon emission reduction  energy production technology  energy utilization technology  DEA window model  research and development efficiency
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技管理研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号