| 孟子“浩然之气”说再考论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张光成.孟子“浩然之气”说再考论[J].河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,26(2):46-49. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张光成 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 军械工程学院,政教室,河北,石家庄,050003 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “治然之气”在中哲史研究中常常被作为神秘主义的范畴而末得到深究。本文给予厘定与解释：《管子》的精气说是孟子“浩然之气”范畴的历史来源。孟子予精气说以人大主义的内涵，从而使这一朴素的唯物主义本体学说成为孟子沟通天人，打通本体与伦理、天道与人德的重要哲学观念。
|
| 关 键 词： | 孟子 浩然之气 精气说 精神 本体 伦理 天道 人德 先秦儒家哲学 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5587(2003)02-0046-04 |
On Mencius' righteousness |
| |
| ZHANG Guang,cheng.On Mencius'''' righteousness[J].Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science),2003,26(2):46-49. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Guang cheng |
| |
| Abstract: | Righteousness is usually considered as a category of mystery in Chinese history of philosophy. Yet this paper is intended to redefine righteousness for a better understanding. It is assumed that the righteousness principle of Mencius derives from the spiritual doctrine as historical resource. Mencius bases his assumption upon humanism so as to enable this materialistic ontology to be well-known as a philosophical conception joining ontology versus ethic, and nature versus morality. |
| |
| Keywords: | righteousness ontology vs ethic nature vs morality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
