| 文学史方法：从分析走向综合 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 温潘亚.文学史方法：从分析走向综合[J].淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2001,23(4):497-500. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 温潘亚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 盐城师范学院,中文系,江苏,盐城,224002 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 江苏省哲学社会科学“九五”规划项目 (编号 :苏规划 10 40 0 4) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪50年代以后，西方学史研究方法也开始了从现代、后现代到后殖民，开始走向意识形态综合分析的发展过程。学史家们在“杂取种种”的同时，为避免陷入机械他律论的误区而努力寻找“中介”，在学与社会化之间插入第三项，将学的外因转化为内质。对中国的学史家来说，需具有广阔的化视野和学术批判眼光，注意学史对象的适用性、可行性及方法之间的互补性，直至融汇贯通。
|
| 关 键 词： | 整体化 西方文学史 研究方法 综合分析 意识形态 文学史研究 社会文化 文学史对象 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8444(2001)04-0497-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001年1月11日 |
Methods of Literary History: from Analysis to Synthesis |
| |
| WEN Pan,ya.Methods of Literary History: from Analysis to Synthesis[J].Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition),2001,23(4):497-500. |
| |
| Authors: | WEN Pan ya |
| |
| Abstract: | In the second half of 20th century, study methods of Western literature history began its journey from modernism to postmodernism and then to postcolonialism to find a way of ideological synthesis and analysis. Literary historians inserted between literature and social culture a third alternative as an intermediary to avoid being trapped in mechanism in the course of diverse selection, and hence transited the external cause of literature into the inner quality. For Chinese literary historians, it is necessary to have a broad view of culture and academic criticism, with much attention to the applicable and feasible objects of literary history and complementary methods to achieve perfection. |
| |
| Keywords: | integrity intermediary dialogue perfection |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
