| 我国体育用品制造业转移的方向路径及影响因素——基于中国工企数据库的分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱华友,金环环,戴艳,蒋自然.我国体育用品制造业转移的方向路径及影响因素——基于中国工企数据库的分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2020,54(4):59-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱华友 金环环 戴艳 蒋自然 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 浙江师范大学 经济与管理学院, 浙江 金华 321004;2. 浙江师范大学 体育与健康学院, 浙江 金华 321004;3. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所, 区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"我国体育用品制造业的去地方化问题与转型升级研究"（17YJA890002）；国家自然科学基金项目"企业再地方化与地区转型发展：机理与路径"（41571112）；浙江省自然科学基金项目"产业集聚的企业根植性、外部性与地区转型发展"（LY16D010002）资助。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 结合我国体育用品规上制造业的区位熵及产值份额变化量来识别体育用品制造业的转移,通过标准差椭圆结果分析其转移的方向、路径与距离,同时运用逻辑模型对短面板数据进行回归,分析2000—2015年影响我国体育用品制造业产业转移的因素,研究得出以下结论:(1)我国体育用品制造业在东部地区具有绝对集聚优势,但通过产业转移,一些中西部省份如江西、湖南等开始跻身优势区域;(2)在转移数量上,上海、福建转出量最大,中部地区江西、湖南和安徽转入量最大,西部地区四川、广西转入最大,东部地区如山东也存在产业转入;(3)我国体育用品制造业在空间上呈“北(偏东)—南(偏西)”的分布格局,并呈现“北偏西-西偏南-南偏西”垂直翻转的“√”型转移的趋势;(4)产业固定资产投资、人力资源、技术水平、基础设施、经济支撑是促进我国体育用品制造业转入的主要因素;人力成本越高、地方政府税收越高则会降低产业转入的概率,其中人力资源与地方政府政策影响程度最大。
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育用品制造业 产业转移 方向和路径 影响因素 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-01-08 |
Transfer and Influential Factors of China's Sports Goods Manufacturing—An Analysis Based on Database of Chinese Industry and Enterprises |
| |
| ZHU Huayou,JIN Huanhuan,DAI Yan,et al.Transfer and Influential Factors of China's Sports Goods Manufacturing—An Analysis Based on Database of Chinese Industry and Enterprises[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education,2020,54(4):59-66. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Huayou JIN Huanhuan DAI Yan |
| |
| Institution: | 1. School of Economics & Management, Zhejiang Normal Univ., Jinhua 321004, China;2. School of Sports & Health, Zhejiang Normal Univ., Jinhua 321004, China;3. Key Lab of Regional Sustainable Development Modelling, Inst. of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research(IGSNRR), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The transfer of sports goods manufacturing industry in China was identified by using the change of location entropy and output value of industrial enterprises. The direction, path and distance were analyzed by standard deviation ellipse. Meanwhile, the factors affecting the transfer from 2000 to 2015 were analyzed based on the logical model. It was shown that China's sports goods manufacturing industry had absolute agglomeration advantage in the eastern region. After industrial transfer, some central and western provinces, such as Jiangxi and Hunan, began to enter the dominant areas. In term of quantity of transfer, Shanghai and Fujian had the largest roll-in volume among the eastern provinces, while Jiangxi, Hunan and Anhui had the largest roll-in volume in the central region, Sichuan and Guangxi in the western region.There was transfer in eastern region such as Shandong. During the research period, China's sports goods manufacturing industry had a spatial distribution pattern of "north(eastward)-south(westward)", and presented spatial pattern evolution trend of "northwest-southwest-southwest", which showed tick-type of horizontal inversion. Industrial fixed assets investment, human resources, technical level, infrastructure, economic support were the main factors to promote the transfer of sports goods manufacturing industry in China. The higher the labor cost, the higher the local government tax would reduce the probability of industrial transfer, among which human resources and local government policies had the greatest impact. |
| |
| Keywords: | sports goods manufacturing industry industrial transfer direction influential factor |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
