| 行政听证笔录效力的再判定——兼析《重庆市行政程序条例(草案)》(建议稿)第71条 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 阮李全,冯子轩.行政听证笔录效力的再判定——兼析《重庆市行政程序条例(草案)》(建议稿)第71条[J].涪陵师范学院学报,2009,25(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 阮李全 冯子轩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 阮李全,RUAN Li-quan(重庆师范大学政治与社会学院,重庆,400047);冯子轩,FENG Zi-xuan(西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆,400031)
|
| |
| 摘 要： | 以1996年<中华人民共和国行政处罚法>的施行作为开端,行政听证制度在我国已走过12个年头.听证制度在实践中发挥了积极作用,但也面临着一系列棘手的问题,常常遭遇"听而不证"、 "证而无力"的困境和尴尬,致使听证往往流于形式,其本身所固有的重要证据价值远远未发挥出来.究其因,主要源于听证笔录效力界定的不完善,证据规则不全,<重庆市行政程序条例(草案)>(建议稿)尽管对某些证据规则有所细化,但仍然没有明晰该类证据的效力问题.因此,本文对行政听证笔录的效力进行再判定,从诉讼民主和提高诉讼效率的角度来分析,行政听证笔录的效力应及于行政决定、行政复议和司法审查程序中,发挥其应有的效果.
|
| 关 键 词： | 行政听证笔录 效力范围 行政决定 行政复议 司法审查 |
Redefining the Effectiveness of Hearing Record--Analyzing Item 71 of Administrative Procedures Ordinance of Chongqing Municipality(draft of suggestion) |
| |
| RUAN Li-quan,FENG Zi-xuan.Redefining the Effectiveness of Hearing Record--Analyzing Item 71 of Administrative Procedures Ordinance of Chongqing Municipality(draft of suggestion)[J].JOurnal of Fuling Teachers College,2009,25(1). |
| |
| Authors: | RUAN Li-quan FENG Zi-xuan |
| |
| Institution: | 1.School of Politics and Sociology;Chongqing Normal University;Chongqing 400047;2.School of Adiministrative Law;Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Chongqing 400031;China |
| |
| Abstract: | Twelve years has passed since hearing system was implemented in 1996.It has played a positive role in practice,but at the same time it is facing a series of difficult problems such as " hearing without evidence" or "weak evidence",so that the role of hearing system cannot be brought into full play.Exploring the causes for this problem,the writer of this paper finds it stems from imperfect defining of the effectiveness of hearing record,and incomplete evidence regulations.Although some evidence regulations i... |
| |
| Keywords: | executive hearing record range of effectiveness executive decision executive reconsideration judicature audit |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
