| 科研机构用户利用学术社交网络的学科差异研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 严炜炜,刘倩,温馨,易胜伟.科研机构用户利用学术社交网络的学科差异研究[J].情报科学,2020,38(6):11-16. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 严炜炜 刘倩 温馨 易胜伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072;武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072;武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072;武汉大学信息管理学院,湖北武汉430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 【目的/意义】科研机构是科研创新的核心参与主体,在学科划分基础上对其学术社交网络的利用规律的分析,有助于揭示科研机构进行网络学术交互的学科差异特征,并指导科研机构用户依据学科特征合理利用学术社交网络。【方法/过程】本文选取中国科学院作为研究对象,在进行用户学科划分的基础上,通过分析学术社交网络ResearchGate(R G)和Academia.edu(Academia)的用户行为数据,从用户分布、交互关系、成果分享和主题关注四个方面归纳不同学科用户的利用行为差异。【结果/结论】数理科学、生命科学、地球科学的科研机构用户能积极且有效利用学术社交网络,化学科学、信息科学的用户参与意愿强烈但利用情况不够理想,工程与材料科学、管理科学、医学科学的用户目前参与人次较少但仍具潜力。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学科差异 科研机构 学术社交网络 利用行为 |
An Analysis of the Disciplinary Differences in Utilizing Academic Social Networking Sites for Research Institution Users |
| |
| YAN Wei-wei,LIU Qian,WEN Xin,YI Sheng-wei.An Analysis of the Disciplinary Differences in Utilizing Academic Social Networking Sites for Research Institution Users[J].Information Science,2020,38(6):11-16. |
| |
| Authors: | YAN Wei-wei LIU Qian WEN Xin YI Sheng-wei |
| |
| Institution: | (School of Information Management,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430012,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | 【Purpose/significance】Research institutions are the core participants in scientific research innovation. Analyzing their utilization of academic social networking sites based on the division of disciplines will help reveal the disciplinarian characteristics of academic interaction among research institutions, and thus guide the members of research institutions to make appropriate use of academic social networking sites.【Method/process】On the basis of disciplinary division, this paper chooses Chinese Academy of Sciences as the research subject.It analyzes the user behavior data of the academic social networking sites--ResearchGate(RG) and Academia.edu(Academia), and summarizes utilization differences from four aspects: user structure, interaction relationship, publication sharing and topic concerns.【Result/conclusion】Users of research institutions in mathematical and physical sciences, life sciences and earth sciences can utilize academic social networks both positively and effectively, while those from chemical sciences and information sciences have strong willingness to participate, but there is still much room for improvement. Meanwhile, it’s potential for engineering and materials sciences, management sciences and health sciences users to participate more in academic social networking sites. |
| |
| Keywords: | disciplinary difference research institution academic social networking site use behavior |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《情报科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《情报科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
