首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

绿色研发投入与“中国制造”在全球价值链的攀升
引用本文:殷宝庆,肖文,刘洋.绿色研发投入与“中国制造”在全球价值链的攀升[J].科学学研究,2018,36(8):1395-1403.
作者姓名:殷宝庆  肖文  刘洋
作者单位:1. 浙江大学经济学院 2. 浙江大学 3. 4. 南开大学国际经济研究所
摘    要:基于全球价值链视角构建绿色研发投入影响“中国制造”升级的理论分析框架,从产业高度、出口部门碳生产率与出口产品技术含量三个维度综合测度“中国制造”升级水平,并利用我国30个省级层面样本数据实证检验了绿色研发投入对“中国制造”升级的影响。研究表明:① 2002-2015年间“中国制造”升级水平呈现先下降后缓慢上升的“V”型曲线特征,并依照东部地区、中部地区、西部地区依次递减。②平均看,绿色研发投入与“中国制造”升级水平之间符合“U”型关系,即绿色研发投入强度由弱变强,将对“中国制造”升级水平产生先削弱后提升的影响。绿色研发投入对“中国制造”升级的影响在不同经济地带、不同人力资本水平地区、不同知识产权保护程度地区存在一定的差异。③全球价值链嵌入度和资本密集度对“中国制造”升级具有显著的促进作用,而市场化程度对“中国制造”升级的作用并不明显。

收稿时间:2017-08-01

Green R&D investment and "Made in China" Upgrade:An Empirical Test Based on Global Value Chains Specialization
Abstract:This paper first constructs a theoretical framework that green R&D investment influences "Made in China" upgrade from the perspective of the global value chains specialization.On the basis of this, the author builds the index system of "China Manufacturing" upgrade from the three aspects of the height of industry, the carbon productivity of export sector and the technological content of export products, and then use 30 provincial sample data to test the effect of green R&D investment on the "Made in China" upgrade. The result of empirical test shows that: (1) "China-made" upgrade level in the year 2002 to 2015 shows "V" type trend,descending first and then slowly rising, and descends in the order of the eastern region, the central region and the western region . (2) On average, there is a U-type relationship between green R&D investment and the level of "Made in China" upgrade, which means the initial weaker intensity of green R&D investment weakens the level of upgrading of "Made in China", however, with the increase of intensity of green R&D investment, the level of upgrading of "Made in China" increases.There are some differences of the impact of green R&D Investment on the level of "Made in China" Upgrading in different economic zones, different human capital regions, and different intellectual property protection regions. (3)The embedding degree of global value chain and capital intensity have a significant promotion effect on the "Made in China" upgrade, and the effect of marketization on the "Made in China" upgrade is not obvious.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科学学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科学学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号