| 图书馆的著作权侵权责任探析--从判例看无过错行为立法保护的必要性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 金雪梅.图书馆的著作权侵权责任探析--从判例看无过错行为立法保护的必要性[J].新世纪图书馆,2021(3):5-11. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 金雪梅 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 深圳大学城图书馆 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2018年深圳市图书情报研究课题“公共图书馆的著作权侵权责任探析--兼论公共图书馆无过错行为的立法保护”(项目编号:深文体旅函〔2018〕407号)研究成果。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 通过分析多年来著作权纠纷中,法院对图书馆是否侵权作出的判决结果以及判决理由和法律依据,发现图书馆在为公众提供文献信息服务过程中,因数字资源提供商或其他提供资源内容的合作方过错而被告侵权时,如果非故意亦不存在过失,一般只承担停止侵权等民事责任,不承担侵权损害赔偿责任;但在共同侵权案例中,却可能被判承担连带赔偿责任。根据相关理论和具体案例,进一步探讨图书馆如何履行合理注意义务,确保自己没有过错,以及如何在自己无能为力之处寻求立法保护。
|
| 关 键 词： | 图书馆 著作权纠纷 主观过错 侵权赔偿责任 |
On the Duty of Care for Public Library in Copyright Disputes:on the Necessity of Legislative Protection of No Fault Behavior From the Perspective of Precedents |
| |
| Authors: | Jin Xuemei |
| |
| Abstract: | Through the analysis of the judgment results,reasons and legal basis of whether the library infringes in copyright disputes for many years,it is found that in the process of providing literature and information services for the public,if the defendant infringes due to the fault of the digital resource provider or other partners who provide resources and content,if there is no intentional fault,the defendant generally only undertakes to stop the infringement.However,in joint tort cases,they may be sentenced to joint and several liability.According to the relevant theories and specific cases,this paper further discusses how the library performs the reasonable duty of care to ensure that it has no fault,and how to seek legislative protection where it can’t do anything. |
| |
| Keywords: | Library Copyright violations Subjective fault Tort liability |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
