| “目的论”与“功能对等论”比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱浩彤.“目的论”与“功能对等论”比较[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,39(4):112-116. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱浩彤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 福建医科大学,基础医学院,外语教学部,福建,福州,350004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 德国功能派翻译理论的奠基理论———“目的论”和美国语言学派翻译理论家奈达的核心理论“功能对等论”有其相似之处,也有其不同之处。本文试从两者的“同”入手,着重谈二者的“异”。通过对这两种翻译理论的比较研究,旨在说明前者在一定程度上克服了后者的缺陷,拓宽了翻译研究视角,是对后者的重大突破和重要补充。
|
| 关 键 词： | “目的论” “功能对等论” 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-579(2006)04-0112-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 07 26 2006 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年7月26日 |
A Comparison and Contrast between "Skopostheory" and "Functional Equivalence Theory" |
| |
| ZHU Hao-tong.A Comparison and Contrast between "Skopostheory" and "Functional Equivalence Theory"[J].Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2006,39(4):112-116. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Hao-tong |
| |
| Institution: | Foreign Language Department, Basic College of Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350004, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Skopostheory,the fundamental theory of German functionalist translation theory,and Functional Equivalence Theory,the core theory of Eugene A.Nida (American linguistic-oriented translation theorist),have their similarities as well as dissimilarities.This paper will firstly deal with their similarities,and then try to focus on their dissimilarities.A comparative study of these two theories is to show that the former,getting rid of the limitations of the latter to some degree,studying translation from a multi-dimentional perspective,is a great breakthrough and an important supplement to the latter. |
| |
| Keywords: | "skopostheory" "functional equivalence theory" comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
