| 科技学术期刊标准化审稿的层次与要素分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 鲁亚琳,史妍.科技学术期刊标准化审稿的层次与要素分析[J].编辑学报,2013,25(5):419-421. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 鲁亚琳 史妍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 《南京理工大学学报(自然科学版)》编辑部;南京理工大学学术中心 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 中国高校科技期刊研究会基金项目(GBJXC1271) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对科技学术期刊审稿要素多、审稿周期长的状况,为了提高审稿效率,提出分层次的标准化审稿方法。将诸审稿要素按照其相关性和特点归纳为宏观要素、中观要素和微观要素,将审稿过程分为初审—复审—终审—定稿4个层次。按照学术期刊审稿的内在规律,在4个层次中以不同力度分别处理这3类要素,达到细致、科学、全面、快速审稿的目的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 审稿要素 审稿层次 标准化审稿 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013/3/10 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2013/3/10 0:00:00 |
Analysis on hierarchies and elements in normalized review of academic periodicals |
| |
| LU Yalin and SHI Yan.Analysis on hierarchies and elements in normalized review of academic periodicals[J].Acta Editologica,2013,25(5):419-421. |
| |
| Authors: | LU Yalin and SHI Yan |
| |
| Institution: | LU Yalin;SHI Yan;Editorial Department of Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology(Natural Edition); |
| |
| Abstract: | Given that there are many factors involved in peer review of academic journals the review process is time-consuming, a normalized hierarchical review method for sic-tech academic periodicals is presented to improve review efficiency. According to the relevance and features, all the review factors are categorized into macro-, medium element, and micro elements, and the whole review process is divided into four steps:initial review, peer review, re-review and final review. According to the intrinsic characteristics of review of academic papers, the three levels of elements are treated with different attentions in the four steps, so that the detailed, scientific, general and rapid review can be realized more easily. |
| |
| Keywords: | review elements review hierarchies normalized review |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《编辑学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
