| 学科差异与学术评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 顾建民.学科差异与学术评价[J].高等教育研究,2006(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 顾建民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江大学高等教育研究所 浙江杭州310028 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 学科间在知识属性、研究范式、学科文化和成果形式等方面存在明显差异,基于学科差异的分学科评价是保证学术评价客观公正的前提。然而,在当今以强调绩效责任、提高管理效率为取向的学术评价中,学科差异没有得到应有的尊重。为此,善用学术评价,应强调大学自治和教授治学,实行政学分开、降低管理重心,正确处理质量与数量、统一与多样的关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术评价 学科差异 绩效责任 |
Disciplinary differences and the assessment of scholarship |
| |
| GU Jian-min.Disciplinary differences and the assessment of scholarship[J].Journal of Higher Education,2006(2). |
| |
| Authors: | GU Jian-min |
| |
| Abstract: | There are many distinct differences among disciplines in terms of nature of knowledge,research paradigm,disciplinary culture and form of scholarly production etc..Based on the differences of disciplines,the classification evaluation is the premise to assuring the objectivity and fairness of the assessment of scholarship.Nowadays in the assessment of scholarship with emphasizing accountability and improving management efficiency,however,the disciplinary differences do not get the respect that is due.Therefore,knowing how to handle the assessment of scholarship should emphasize institutional autonomy and academic independence,detach university from government,grant more power to academic organizations,rightly deal with the relationships between quality and quantity,and between unity and diversity. |
| |
| Keywords: | the assessment of scholarship disciplinary differences accountability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
|
