首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

科学论证的歧途——就所谓“重评型”脂批与欧阳健先生商榷
引用本文:严安政.科学论证的歧途——就所谓“重评型”脂批与欧阳健先生商榷[J].渭南师范学院学报,2003,18(6):41-44,57.
作者姓名:严安政
作者单位:渭南师范学院,中文系,陕西,渭南,714000
基金项目:渭南师范学院重点科研基金资助项目 ( 0 2 YKF0 0 2 )
摘    要:本文逐条批驳了欧阳健《关于脂批的“针对性”和锋芒所向》一文对《红楼梦》中所谓“重评型”脂批的解释及其有关结论,指出欧阳健为了论证其“程前脂后”的观点,已经滑入了牵强求证的末路。

关 键 词:科学论证  “重评型”脂批  欧阳健  《红楼梦》  商榷  文学批评
文章编号:1009-5128(2003)06-0041-04
修稿时间:2003年6月13日

The Misleading Track to Scientific Verification
YAN An,zheng.The Misleading Track to Scientific Verification[J].Journal of Weinan Teachers College,2003,18(6):41-44,57.
Authors:YAN An  zheng
Abstract:The paper tears down explanations and relevant conclusions suggested by so called "Re Commentary Copy" on the text of A Dream of Red Mansions, annotations and commentaries by Zhi Yanzhai, in Ouyang Jian's article On the Pertinence of the Annotations and Commentaries by Zhi Yanzhai. It holds that Ouyang Jian, for the sake of verifying that Cheng Weiyuan's annotations and commentaries was earlier than Zhi Yanzhai's, has slipped to the farfetched dead end in verification.
Keywords:A Dream of Red Mansions  annotations and commentaries by Zhi Yanzhai  Ouyang Jian  discussion
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号