| 国有商业银行剥离不良资产行为属性探究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 罗东旭.国有商业银行剥离不良资产行为属性探究[J].邵阳学院学报(社会科学版),2008,7(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 罗东旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湘潭大学法学院,湖南,湘潭,411201 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近年来,银行剥离的不良资产经过资产公司处置后,新的问题又出现了,许多公司和个人购买不良债权后,纷纷起诉银行,法院按照一般的民事法律关系给予审判,大量案件银行出现败诉承担赔偿责任,使银行再次背上新的包袱。文章试从剥离行为的源头加以研究,并认为银行剥离不良资产行为不具备民事行为的基本属性,是一种国家行政行为,而且,银行所剥离的不良资产过程的一些瑕疵不构成民事侵权,资产公司及以后的资产购买者对银行不应享有追偿权。
|
| 关 键 词： | 国有商业银行 剥离不良资产 行为属性 |
Stripping of State-Owned Commercial Banks Non-Performing Assets of Attributes Inquiry |
| |
| LUO Dong-xu.Stripping of State-Owned Commercial Banks Non-Performing Assets of Attributes Inquiry[J].Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science,2008,7(5). |
| |
| Authors: | LUO Dong-xu |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years,the Bank of stripping the company of non-performing assets through asset disposal,a new problem has emerged,many companies and individuals to purchase non-performing loans,the banks are prosecuted,the court in accordance with the general legal relationship to the civil trial,a large number of cases against bank commitments Liability,the bank once again hit new burden.I try peeling from the source to conduct research,and that stripping the non-performing assets of banks do not have the basic attributes of civil,is a state administrative actions,but also,by stripping the banks of non-performing assets of some flaw in the process does not constitute a tort,assets And after the company purchased the assets of those banks should not enjoy the right to recover. |
| |
| Keywords: | state-owned commercial banks tripping of non-performing assets |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
