Validity of the ActiGraph GT1M during walking and cycling |
| |
| Authors: | Bjorge Herman Hansen Ingvild Børtnes Maria Hildebrand Ingar Holme Elin Kolle Sigmund Alfred Anderssen |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norwaybjorge.herman.hansen@nih.no;3. Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway |
| |
| Abstract: | AbstractThe ActiGraph activity monitors have developed and newer versions of the ActiGraph accelerometers (GT1M, GT3X and GT3X +) are now available, including changes in hardware and software compared to the old version (AM7164). This is problematic as most of the validation and calibration work includes the AM7164. The aims of the study were to validate the ActiGraph GT1M during level and graded walking and to assess the potential underestimation of physical activity during cycling. Data were obtained from 20 participants during treadmill walking and ergometer cycling. Energy expenditure was measured via indirect calorimetry and used as the criterion method. Activity counts were highly correlated with energy expenditure during level walking (R2 = 0.82) and graded walking at 5% and 8% (R2 = 0.82 and R2 = 0.67, respectively). There was no linear relationship between activity counts and energy expenditure during cycling. The average activity counts for all data points during cycling was 1,157 counts per minute (CPM) (SD = 974), and mean energy expenditure was 5.0 metabolic equivalents. The GT1M is a valid tool for assessing walking across a wide range of speeds and gradients. However, there is no relationship between activity counts and energy expenditure during cycling and physical activity is underestimated by ≈73% during cycling compared to walking. |
| |
| Keywords: | Actigraphy physical activity walking cycling |
|
|
