| 关于"毛周体制"的看法——答汪浩同志 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘济生.关于"毛周体制"的看法——答汪浩同志[J].淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,28(5):617-620. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘济生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内蒙古民族大学,马列部,内蒙古,通辽,028043 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 汪浩同志反复论述的“毛周体制”从法理上说是不存在的,从客观实际上说也是不通的。毛泽东周恩来有过长期的密切合作,但也有意见不一致的时候,或产生重大分歧的时候。“毛周体制”不是民主政治的体制,而是类似历史上的寡头政治,所以不宜宣传,不宜作为党的建设和国家制度的价值目标。
|
| 关 键 词： | “毛周体制” 合作 分歧 寡头政治 价值目标 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8444（2006）05-0617-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-06-20 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年6月20日 |
View about "The Leading System of Mao Ze-dong and Zhou En-lai"——Response to Wang Hao |
| |
| LIU Ji-sheng.View about "The Leading System of Mao Ze-dong and Zhou En-lai"——Response to Wang Hao[J].Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition),2006,28(5):617-620. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Ji-sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | The leading system of Mao Ze-dong and Zhou En-lai put forward by Mr.Wang Hao is not exist from the nomology aspect and unreasonable from the objective facts.In spite of their long-term cooperation between Mao Ze-dong and Zhou En-lai,they disagreed each other sometimes and even produced great difference.The leading system is not democratic,just like historical oligarchy,which should not be advocated or regarded as the value object of the Party construction and the state system. |
| |
| Keywords: | the leading system between Mao Ze-dong and Zhou Enlai cooperation difference oligarchy value object |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
