| 普惠化制度安排、选择性直接支持与企业研发绩效——政府参与的异质性创新治理效应 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈庆江,王彦萌,兰珊.普惠化制度安排、选择性直接支持与企业研发绩效——政府参与的异质性创新治理效应[J].科研管理,2021,42(1):78-87. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈庆江 王彦萌 兰珊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东财经大学工商管理学院，山东 济南250014 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金一般项目(19BJY037,2019.07-2022.06)。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 基于2008—2017年中国A股制造业上市公司数据以及企业所在城市地方政府工作报告的文本分析，考察普惠化制度安排和选择性直接支持对企业研发绩效的影响及其异质性创新治理效应。研究发现：（1）与选择性直接支持相比，普惠化制度安排能够更精准地促进企业高质量研发产出，且其创新促进作用更持久；（2）政府参与创新的两种方式对企业高质量研发产出存在协同促进作用；（3）普惠化制度安排能够缓解不完善的市场化环境对企业研发活动的负面影响，而选择性直接支持的创新促进作用在较高的市场化水平下才能充分实现；（4）普惠化制度安排对不同生命周期企业的研发绩效均有显著促进作用，而选择性直接支持的政策效果在成长期企业中更显著。政府应在进一步优化现有选择性、差异化直接支持政策的同时，更加注重通过功能性、普惠化的制度安排推动国家创新治理体系完善和优化。
|
| 关 键 词： | 政府参与 普惠化制度安排 选择性直接支持 研发绩效 异质性创新治理效应 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-02-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2020-06-15 |
Inclusive institutional arrangement,selective direct support and R&D performance of enterprises:Heterogeneity in the innovation governance effect of government participation |
| |
| Chen Qingjiang,Wang Yanmeng,Lan Shan.Inclusive institutional arrangement,selective direct support and R&D performance of enterprises:Heterogeneity in the innovation governance effect of government participation[J].Science Research Management,2021,42(1):78-87. |
| |
| Authors: | Chen Qingjiang Wang Yanmeng Lan Shan |
| |
| Institution: | School of Business Administration, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Inclusive institutional arrangement and selective direct support are two main ways for governments exerting their influence on enterprises′innovation activities.The former refers to governments managing to create a suitable external environment for regional innovation activities through industrial,legal,talent,financial and other functional institutional arrangements.The latter is the government′s selective and differential funding support for specific industries or specific enterprises,which aims to enhance industrial security,and speed up technology catch-up or radical innovations in key fields.Based on the data of manufacturing companies listed in China′s mainland and text analysis of the work report of local government from 2008 to 2017,fixed effect models are employed to investigate the impact of different ways of government′s participation on the innovation output of enterprises.The firm-level data such as patent authorization and government subsidies required for empirical research comes from the CSMAR database.The data required for regional level variables such as economic development level and industrial structure characteristics extract from the China Economic Database(CEIC).This paper sorts out the government work reports for the corresponding year in the 225 cities where the sample companies are located,and text analysis based on 10 keywords related to institutional arrangement provide a reasonable measurement of institutional arrangement.Inclusive institutional arrangement can promote high-quality innovation output of enterprises more precisely."Spill-over effect"of the policy on low-quality innovation output is not significant.The possible reason is that China′s social innovation resources are still relatively insufficient in current period,and the optimization of institutional environment promotes the free flow of innovation elements and leads resources to flow more to high-quality innovation activities.On the other hand,inclusive institutional arrangement is less likely to induce companies to"whitewash"their R&D performance with low-quality innovation output.Selective direct support can promote high-quality innovation output as well,while this policy may induce enterprises′opportunistic behavior of whitewashing their R&D performance with low-quality innovation output.Information asymmetry between government and support targets is higher in the innovation process and output quality,and opportunistic behavior is more likely to occur.Synergistic effects between two ways of government participation exist in high-quality innovation output only.Inclusive institutional arrangements can inhibit the opportunistic behavior of enterprises in the process of policy implementation,and improve the governance effects of government direct support.Selective direct support may guide the allocation of social resources to specific enterprises or industries,which can magnify and strengthen the promotion effect of institutional arrangements.Compared with selective direct support,effects of inclusive institutional arrangement are more durable.The innovation promotion effect of inclusive institutional arrangement has a sustainable impact lasting for at least three years.Although the effect of selective support has deferred effects also,its durability is lower.Based on the above analysis,inclusive institutional arrangement is a kind of long-term mechanism,which can promote high-quality innovation output of enterprises.Inclusive institutional arrangement can alleviate the negative effect of poor market environment to some extent,while selective direct support for innovation promotion can only be fully realized at a high level of marketization.The policy effect of institutional arrangements is inclusive,which have no significant difference among enterprises of different life cycle.The innovation promotion effect of selective support is more significant for enterprises in the growing stage,whose resources are relatively insufficient.This paper mainly contributes to the area in the following aspects:First,it introduces the inclusive and functional institutional arrangements into the analytical framework of government intervention and social innovation activities,and expands the research horizon in related fields.Second,the systematic analysis of the two ways of government participation in innovation on the promotion of different quality R&D output of enterprises and the persistence of their policy effects has clarified the heterogeneous innovation governance effects of the two participation methods,providing an analytical framework for reference for subsequent research.In the backgrounds of global changes in the trend of technological innovation,the research findings mentioned above can provide references for China to improve its national scientific and technological innovation governance system and promote the modernization of government technological innovation governance capabilities.In this process,government should pay more attention to regional innovation environment shaping through functional and inclusive institutional arrangements while continuing to refine the existing selective and differentiated innovation policies.At the same time,the public innovation policy portfolios should be adjusted based on the regional market-oriented environment,the life cycle of enterprises and resource capabilities,to fully realize its synergistic governance effect. |
| |
| Keywords: | government participation inclusive institutional arrangement selective direct support R&D performance heterogeneity in the innovation governance effect |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《科研管理》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
