| 科技评价改革十年评述 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐芳,李晓轩.科技评价改革十年评述[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(5):603-612. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐芳 李晓轩 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190;中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金面上项目（72174191）,国家社会科学基金重大项目（21ZDA016）,中国科学院青年创新促进会会员项目（2018187） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近10年来,以“三评”、破“四唯”为代表的科技评价改革文件多、力度大,取得了较好效果,但差距依然巨大。改革效果大体可概括为“表层强,中层半,底层弱”,即：较好地破除了“三评”中的不合理的评价数量、频次、指标等表层问题;在奖励制度、人才计划、项目经费管理等“唯”的本体方面启动了改革,但是改革还在半途;科技评价改革尚未从底层实现引导科研人员追求卓越的价值导向方面的根本好转,“破”之后“立”什么的问题尚有待解决。
|
| 关 键 词： | 科技评价 改革 “三评” 破“四唯” |
| 收稿时间： | 2022/4/29 0:00:00 |
Review on Reform of Research Evaluation in Past Decade |
| |
| XU Fang,LI Xiaoxuan.Review on Reform of Research Evaluation in Past Decade[J].Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2022,37(5):603-612. |
| |
| Authors: | XU Fang LI Xiaoxuan |
| |
| Institution: | Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Over the past decade, there have been many scientific and technological evaluation reform documents and great efforts represented by "Three Evaluations" and breaking "Four Only", which have achieved good results but the gap is still huge. This reform has better eliminated the surface problems such as unreasonable evaluation quantity, frequency, and index in the "Three Evaluations". The reform has been initiated in the reward system, talent plan, and project fund management, but is still halfway. The reform of scientific and technological evaluation has not yet achieved a fundamental improvement in the value orientation of guiding scientific researchers to pursue excellence from the bottom, and the problem of new evaluation approach remains to be solved. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院院刊》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国科学院院刊》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
