| 宋代词论辨疑四则 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高峰.宋代词论辨疑四则[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2003(3):65-68. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高峰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学,文学院,江苏,南京,210097 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 学术界历来认为,宋代词论中苏轼鄙视柳永,而李清照又不满苏轼。事实上,苏轼对柳永的态度比较辩证,李清照的词“别是一家”与苏轼“以诗为词”的理论,具备内在精神的一致性。张炎《词源》提出“清空”概念,众多学推许它是清雅人格的象征,细经辨析,则应属于词法范畴的规则。
|
| 关 键 词： | 宋朝 词论 苏轼 柳永 李清照 清空 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-9853(2003)03-065-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年3月25日 |
Four Queries on Ci Commentaries of the Song Dynasty |
| |
| Gao Feng.Four Queries on Ci Commentaries of the Song Dynasty[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2003(3):65-68. |
| |
| Authors: | Gao Feng |
| |
| Abstract: | The academia has long claimed that in ci commentaries of the Song Dynasty, Su Shi feels a contempt for Liu Yong, while Li Qingzhao does not think much of Su Shi. But in fact, Su s attitude towards Liu is of a comparatively dialectical one. There also exists a sort of internal uniformity between Li Qingzhao s ' unique style of ci poetry and Su's theory on "making use of poetry in ci composition." Zhang Yan' s Origin of Ci Poetry puts forward the concept of "pure and void," of which not a few scholars conjecture it to be a symbol of his detached and elegant disposition. Yet careful examination and analysis tell us that it should belong in the category of skills in ci writing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Su Shi Li Qingzhao pure and void |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
