| 高强度间歇训练与中强度持续训练对中国超重或肥胖人群干预效果比较的Meta分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高思垚,吕万刚.高强度间歇训练与中强度持续训练对中国超重或肥胖人群干预效果比较的Meta分析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2019,53(2):66-73. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高思垚 吕万刚 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉体育学院 研究生院, 湖北 武汉 430079;2. 武汉体育学院, 湖北 武汉 430079 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目（18BTY118）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的:利用Meta分析的方法比较高强度间歇训练(High-Intensity Interval Training,HIIT)与中强度持续训练(Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training,MICT)对中国超重或肥胖人群干预作用的有效性。方法:在中英文电子数据库中检索2017年12月之前所有相关的临床随机对照研究文献,并对参考文献进行相关文献的补充检索,利用Review Manager 5.3软件合并效应量。结果:研究共纳入13篇研究,HIIT组和MICT组分别纳入214例和208例成年超重或肥胖患者。结果显示:HIIT降低超重或肥胖患者体脂百分数WMD=-1.23(95%CI=-2.31,-0.15),I2=68%]及提高最大摄氧量(VO2max)WMD=1.02(95%CI=0.14,1.90),I2=0%]的能力优于MICT;而HIIT和MICT对体重、BMI(Body mass index)、瘦体重(LBM,Lean Body Mass)、腰围、臀围及腰臀比(Waist-to-Hip Ratio,WHR)的改变无显著差异。结论:平均10.5周(3次/周以上)的最大摄氧量(VO2max)为85%～95%的高强度间歇训练(HIIT)处方治疗降低中国超重或肥胖患者体脂量的能力优于中强度持续训练(MICT),但对其他体测指标方面两种运动没有差异。
|
| 关 键 词： | 运动人体科学 运动生理学 健身 高强度间歇训练 中强度持续训练 肥胖 超重 中国人 META分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018-03-29 |
Comparison of Intervention Effect of High-intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-intensity Continuous Training in Overweight and Obese Chinese Adults: A Meta-analysis |
| |
| GAO Siyao,LYU Wangang.Comparison of Intervention Effect of High-intensity Interval Training vs Moderate-intensity Continuous Training in Overweight and Obese Chinese Adults: A Meta-analysis[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education,2019,53(2):66-73. |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Siyao LYU Wangang |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Graduate Dept., Wuhan Sports Univ., Wuhan 430079, China;2. Office of Wuhan Sports Univ., Wuhan 430079, China |
| |
| Abstract: | The objective of this study was to compare the intervention effect of High-intensity Interval Training (HⅡT) and Moderate-intensity Continuous Training (MICT) in overweight and obese Chinese adults. Randomly controlled studies before May 2017 were retrieved by using keywords in electric database. Data after the strict quality evaluation and Review Manager 5.3 software for merging effect size included that 13 papers, 214 participants in HⅡT group and 208 participants in MICT group. Meta-analysis showed that HⅡT was better at lowering the body fat percentageWMD=-1.23(95%CI=-2.31,-0.15),I2=68%], and at improving the VO2max levelWMD=1.02(95%CI=0.14,1.90),I2=0%] in overweight/obese patients. But there were no significant difference in weight, BMI(Body mass index, LBM (Lean Body Mass), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC) and WHR(Waist-to-Hip Ratio)between two type approaches. It could be seen that an average 10.5 weeks×3 sessions per week HⅡT had more effectiveness in lowering the body fat percentage and improving the VO2max level, but the similar picture was obtained in other body measurements. |
| |
| Keywords: | kinesiology sports physiology body building High-intensity Interval Training Moderate-intensity Continuous Training overweight obesity people in China meta-analysis |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
