| 高等教育大众化研究方法的比较与反思 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李盛兵,马晓洁.高等教育大众化研究方法的比较与反思[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,0(1):104-110. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李盛兵 马晓洁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 华南师范大学国际文化学院,广东,广州,510631
2. 华南师范大学教育科学学院,广东,广州,510631 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在高等教育大众化研究中，研究方法使用的状况如何反映了该方面研究的科学性、规范性和价值。中外高等教育大众化研究方法上的共同点是思辨方法为高等教育大众化研究的主要方法，比较方法和多学科方法受到重视；不同之处在于国外高等教育大众化研究注重方法的全面性和多样性，国内则以思辨为主，定量为补充；在思辨方法中，国内的研究是以感悟性为主，而国外的研究是以比较和多学科为主；国内外的研究方法在方法论意识和规范性上区别很大。
|
| 关 键 词： | 高等教育大众化 研究方法 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-5455（2007）01-0104-07 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-11-06 |
Comparison and Reconsideration of the Methodology inthe Research of Mass Higher Education |
| |
| LI Sheng-bing,MA Xiao-jie.Comparison and Reconsideration of the Methodology inthe Research of Mass Higher Education[J].Journal of South China Normal University(Social Science Edition),2007,0(1):104-110. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Sheng-bing MA Xiao-jie |
| |
| Abstract: | The methods applied in the research of mass higher education reflect the scientific nature,standardization and value of the researchers on this problem.This paper surveys the methods of the research papers of mass higher education from 2001-2005.The methods applied in China and abroad are compared.We conclude that they are common in that speculative method is the most frequently used,and comparative and multi-disciplinary methods are highly recommended.Differences lie in that the research abroad covers almost all the methods while domestic researches give more importance to speculative methods than the quantitative methods;among the speculative methods applied,domestic researches give first importance to comprehensive speculative methods while comparative methods and multi-disciplinary methods are the main methods of the researches abroad.Therefore,the methodology in the research of mass higher education differentiates much in China and abroad. |
| |
| Keywords: | mass higher education method comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
