首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于学科基线的医学科研人员论文影响力评价
引用本文:杜建,张玢,王敏,张燕舞,刘晓婷,李阳,唐小利,许培扬.基于学科基线的医学科研人员论文影响力评价[J].科学学研究,2012,30(8):1149-1156.
作者姓名:杜建  张玢  王敏  张燕舞  刘晓婷  李阳  唐小利  许培扬
作者单位:中国医学科学院医学信息研究所,北京,100020
基金项目:北京协和医学院协和青年科研基金,ISTIC-THOMSONREUTERS科学计量学联合实验室开放基金
摘    要:在我国国家标准《学科分类与代码》的基础上,将其医学领域二级学科与Web of Science中生物医学的学科类目进行映射,建立适用于我国医学二级学科的论文影响力和期刊影响力基线数据表,分别从基本数据和基线数据两个分析角度对不同学科和相似学科的学者进行了比较,并对学者优势领域进行了分析。结果表明,应用基线数据的分析能够很好地评价不同学科领域的学者的学术表现。科学合理的基线可以大大提高引文分析在科研评价的价值。

关 键 词:人才评价  论文影响力  文献计量  引文分析  学科基线

Study on the evaluation of citation impact for medical professionals based on disciplinary benchmarks
DU Jian,ZHANG Bin,WANG Min,ZHANG Yan-wu,LIU Xiao-ting, LI Yang,TANG Xiao-li,XU Pei-yang.Study on the evaluation of citation impact for medical professionals based on disciplinary benchmarks[J].Studies in Science of Science,2012,30(8):1149-1156.
Authors:DU Jian  ZHANG Bin  WANG Min  ZHANG Yan-wu  LIU Xiao-ting  LI Yang  TANG Xiao-li  XU Pei-yang
Institution:(Institute of Medical Information,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100020,China)
Abstract:This paper mapped the subdisciplines of Chinese Subject Classification and Codes,i.e.GB/T 13745-2009 to subject categories of Web of Science,and established two disciplinary benchmarks to evaluate the articles and journals academic influence.Based on the basic and baseline data,we compared the academic impact at the indivadule level in different and similar disciplines,and analyzed the superiority field of a researcher.The results demonstrated that disciplinary benchmarks can be used to research performance assessment of researchers in different subject categories,and a scientific and rational baseline may improve the implications of citation analysis.
Keywords:research performance assessment at the indivadule level  citation impact  bibliometrics  citation analysis  disciplinary benchmarks
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号