| 《文心雕龙》论非形式谬误 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郑旭.《文心雕龙》论非形式谬误[J].毕节学院学报,2006,24(5):34-37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郑旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京大学哲学系,江苏,南京,210093 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刘勰的《文心雕龙》是我国古代一部“体大虑周”的文艺理论巨著,它不仅对文学批评方面的一系列重大问题进行了深入地探讨,而且还对逻辑学方面的非形式谬误问题有所涉猎。其所论谬误大致可分为四种,即:文浮于理、论证不当、认知不当、用字(词)不当(包括文字误解)。刘勰的谬误思想是受到因明学“过”之影响的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文心雕龙 谬误 批评 过 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-7059（2006）05-0034-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-09-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年9月6日 |
Informal Fallacy Criticism in "The Literary Heart and the Carving of Dragons" |
| |
| ZHENG Xu.Informal Fallacy Criticism in "The Literary Heart and the Carving of Dragons"[J].Journal of Bijie University,2006,24(5):34-37. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHENG Xu |
| |
| Abstract: | The book of "The Literary Heart and the Carving of Dragons"written by Liu Xie is a monumental work of the theory of literature and is extensive in scope and brilliant in its conception of our ancient literary history.As a book of literary and art criticism,it not only carries on further discussion to a series of important literary and art theories,but also starts examining some informal fallacy problems of logic.There are roughly four types in terms of his analysis,namely: beautiful in words but poor in content;the demonstration is improper,the recognition is improper,the words are improper(including the misunderstanding of words).Liu Xie,'s fallacy conception was affected by the fault theory of the Classical India Logic. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Literary Heart and the Carving of Dragons Informal fallacy criticism Fault theory |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
