首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“文化”的视野及其它——重读杜赞奇的《文化、权力与国家》
引用本文:李恭忠.“文化”的视野及其它——重读杜赞奇的《文化、权力与国家》[J].郧阳师范高等专科学校学报,2005,25(2):53-56.
作者姓名:李恭忠
作者单位:南京大学,历史系,江苏,南京,210093
摘    要:以杜赞奇的《文化、权力与国家》一书为例,评析了历史学领域中新兴的文化研究取向的特色与不足。该书采用的时新的文化分析思路,源于历史学与后现代思潮及象征人类学的联姻。在分析传统中国国家与乡村社会之间的关系,以及这种关系的现代化变迁时,这一思路显示了独到的阐释能力,从而揭示了中国近代政治现代化进程当中极少为人注意的负面效果,也为中国学者提供了启鉴。同时,这种文化研究取向也留下了三个有待进一步讨论的问题,即文化阐释与理论模型建构的关系、经济因素与文化变迁的关系以及国家政权内卷化在文化时空上的差异。

关 键 词:文化研究  权力  国家政权建设  象征人类学
文章编号:1008-6072(2005)02-0053-04
修稿时间:2005年2月10日

Cultural Perspectives and Beyond: Re-reading the book of Culture, Power, and the State
LI Gong-zhong.Cultural Perspectives and Beyond: Re-reading the book of Culture, Power, and the State[J].Journal of Yunyang Teachers College,2005,25(2):53-56.
Authors:LI Gong-zhong
Abstract:This paper makes criticism on Cultural study, a newly but now widely tried approach in historical studies, which is creatively used in the book of Culture, Power, and the State: Rural North China (1900-1942) by Prasenjit Duara. This new approach comes from the connection of post-modernization and symbolic anthropology, and in this book it shows particular power of interpretation of traditional relationship between state and rural society and the changes of it in modern China. For this reason, Chinese scholars may find it inspiring to read this book. Meantime, there are still three questions for further discussion, i.e. the relationship between cultural interpretation and theory building, the relationship between economy and cultural changes, and the difference of state-involution in different period and cultural contexts.
Keywords:Cultural Study  Power  State-making  Symbolic Anthropology  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号