| 关于科学研究者的品格 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾钊新.关于科学研究者的品格[J].大学教育科学,2007(3):5-13. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾钊新 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中南大学,政治学与行政管理学院,湖南,长沙,410083 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 德性是科学的天然品格.学术虚假、学术盗窃、学术廉价、学术歧视是科学研究者当今尤为突出的道德过失.科研工作者的道德过失常常发生在学术阶段.学术是前进在真理路上的知识,是科学明星升空的前奏,是学问诞生的必经之路.因为真理是定型阶段,科学是完成阶段,谁是真理的发现者,谁是科学的创造者,已经定论,已经公认了.唯有学术阶段是动态的、未成型的、未归主的,所以争论者、沾光者、冒名者、扒窃者都云集在这个阶段作祟.这是知识治安的空白地带,是学术安全最没有保障的地带,是学术多发事端的地带.振兴科学,必须首先拯救研究者的学术良心,从而让他们自我纠正在学术阶段中的道德过失.
|
| 关 键 词： | 学术 真理 科学 品格 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-0717（2007）03-0005-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-08-15 |
The Character of Scientific Researchers |
| |
| ZENG Zhao-xin.The Character of Scientific Researchers[J].University Education Science,2007(3):5-13. |
| |
| Authors: | ZENG Zhao-xin |
| |
| Institution: | College of Politics and Administration, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Morality is the natural character of science. The falseness of learning, the stealing of learning , the cheapness of learning and the discrimination of learning are the obvious moral fault of scientific researchers. The moral fault of scientific researchers often occurs in learning stage. Learning is the knowledge going on the way to truth, the prelude that a scientific star rises and the only way that learning comes into being. For truth is the shaping stage, science is the completed stage and who is the discoverer of truth and who is the creator of science, they all have final conclusion and are generally acknowledged. The learning stage alone is developing, unshaped and no - owner. So the disputants, imitators, fakes and thieves gather in this stage. Learning stage is an empty zone of knowledge security, an unguarantee zone of learning safety and a disturbance zone of learning. To develop science, the learning conscience of researchers must be developed first. In this way, the researchers can correct their moral fault in learning stage. |
| |
| Keywords: | learning truth science character |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
