| 质疑“艺术中的符号不是艺术符号” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 齐效斌.质疑“艺术中的符号不是艺术符号”[J].南京师范大学文学院学报,2010(3):144-146. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 齐效斌 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 陕西师范大学,文学院,陕西,西安,710062 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 苏珊.朗格曾经十分详尽地区分了＂艺术符号＂与＂艺术中的符号＂的界限,然而这种区分既不明智也不严密。首先作为论题的前提是不存在的,苏珊.朗格以为只有艺术符号才有完整的体系,实际上艺术中的符号也有自己的完整体系;其次艺术中的符号也有非指称性、表情性等功能。其实,艺术中的符号与艺术符号之间并没有一个不可逾越的鸿沟,在意向性的创造活动中,功能变异艺术中的符号亦可以演变成艺术符号。
|
| 关 键 词： | 艺术符号 艺术中的符号 功能变异 |
Questioning the Argument of "A symbol in Art is not An Artistic Symbol" |
| |
| Qi xiaobin.Questioning the Argument of "A symbol in Art is not An Artistic Symbol"[J].Journal of Chinese Language and Culture School Nanjing Normal University,2010(3):144-146. |
| |
| Authors: | Qi xiaobin |
| |
| Abstract: | Susanne K.Langer has clearly distinguished the boundary of ＂artistic symbols＂ and ＂symbols in art＂,however this boundary is neither clever nor accurate.First,the preposition of this argument is not existed.Langer believes that only artistic symbols have complete systems while actually the symbols in art also have their systems.Second,the symbols in art also have functions of non referring and feeling expressive.Finally,there is no absolute gap between a symbol in art and an artistic symbol＂.In an orientated activity of creation,the symbols in art with function changing can evolve to artistic symbols. |
| |
| Keywords: | artistic symbols symbols in art function change |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
