首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中美法律教育之比较
引用本文:周海岭.中美法律教育之比较[J].河南职业技术师范学院学报(职业教育版),2003(1):57-60.
作者姓名:周海岭
作者单位:河南职业技术师范学院,河南,新乡,453003
摘    要:依法治国方略的实现,需要有一个强大的法律职业共同体,而我国法律职业教育却未能培养出大批的高层次应用型法律人才。美国JD教育,作为美国最为重要的法律教育模式,是以培养法律家为目标的本科后职业教育。本就我国法律教育的现状及其存在的问题进行了剖析,认为借鉴美国JD教育的成功经验,完善我国法律硕士专业教育即JM教育,是我国法律教育改革的正确方向。

关 键 词:法律教育  ID教育  教育改革  JM教育  中国  美国  法律职业  职业教育
文章编号:1008-7516(2003)01-0057-04
修稿时间:2002年11月11

Comparison of legal education in China and that in America
ZHOU Hai,ling.Comparison of legal education in China and that in America[J].Journal of Henan Vocation-Technical Teachers College(Vocational Education Edition),2003(1):57-60.
Authors:ZHOU Hai  ling
Abstract:To govern the country according to law, a strong community of legal vocation is needed, while we haven't cultivated large quantities of high leveled and applying legal persons yet. JD education, as the most important pattern of US legal education, is a kind of vocational education after bachelor, with the goal of cultivating lawyers. This article analyses the situation and the problems of legal education in China, and suggests that the right orientation of legal education reform in China is to perfect Chinese JM education by using for reference the successful experience of US JD education.
Keywords:legal education  education of Juris Doctor  educational reform  education of Juris Master
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号