| 《惜往日》"疑点"辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 殷光熹.《惜往日》"疑点"辨析[J].楚雄师范学院学报,2006,21(2):3-6. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 殷光熹 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 云南大学,云南,昆明,650091 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 南宋以来,不断有人从《惜往日》诗中找出一些“疑点”,判定此篇为“伪作”。本文针对某些具有代表性的“疑点”问题逐一进行了辨析,证明前人所提出的这些“疑点”缺乏根据,不能成立。因此,认定《惜往日》的著作权当属屈原。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《惜往日》 疑点辨析 作者屈原 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-7406（2006）02-0003-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-01-18 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年1月18日 |
Argument "doubtful points" against Regret Bygone Days |
| |
| YIN Guangxi.Argument "doubtful points" against Regret Bygone Days[J].journal of chuxiong normal university,2006,21(2):3-6. |
| |
| Authors: | YIN Guangxi |
| |
| Institution: | YIN Guangxi |
| |
| Abstract: | Many scholars have accepted that Regret Bygone Days was pseudograph of Qu Yuan since Southern Song Dynasty.This paper bear out that Regret Bygone Days was indited by Qu Yuan through differentiation and analyse the typical doubtful points of former scholar. |
| |
| Keywords: | Regret Bygone Days differentiation and analyse the doubtful points the author Qu Yuan |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
