首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“私德外推即为公德”吗?——兼论梁启超的公德私德观
引用本文:程立涛,苏建勇.“私德外推即为公德”吗?——兼论梁启超的公德私德观[J].河北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,30(2):54-58.
作者姓名:程立涛  苏建勇
作者单位:1. 河北师范大学,法政管理学院,河北,石家庄,050091
2. 河北师范大学,河北,石家庄,050016
基金项目:河北省社会科学规划项目
摘    要:源自梁启超的"私德外推即为公德"的观点,忽视了公德生成的长期性、复杂性和规律性,是对私德与公德关系的一种简单化、表面化的理解.辩证考察私德公德之间的内在联系,不能否认和抹杀二者在交往对象、适用范围和道德准则等方面的本质区别.历史和现实充分表明,无论公德还是私德都是社会利益关系的反映,尤其是特定交往关系的产物,各有自身的特点和变化轨迹.批判性地接受梁启超的观点对于当今中国的公德建设尤为重要.

关 键 词:私德  公德  家族伦理  社会伦理  国家伦理
文章编号:23950183
修稿时间:09 19 2006 12:00AM

A debate over Liang Qichao's view of the public morality from private morality
CHENG Li-tao,SU Jian-yong.A debate over Liang Qichao''''s view of the public morality from private morality[J].Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science),2007,30(2):54-58.
Authors:CHENG Li-tao  SU Jian-yong
Institution:1. School of Law and Politics, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050091, China; 2. Hebei normal University,Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050016, China
Abstract:It is claimed in the paper that Liang Qichao's view of the public morality from private morality ignores the rules of the growth and formation of the public morality,oversimplifying the relations of both moralities.So it is argued that the distinction should not neglect or defy the inner natures concerning objects,adaptability,and moral norms.It is observed in history and reality that both public and private moralities reflect the social benefits,in particular,the specific products in exchange,each with its distinctive feature.And it is concluded that a critical study is significant of Liang Qichao's view of the morality for the current construction of Chinese public morality.
Keywords:private morality  public  clan ethics  social ethics  national ethics
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号