首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

《学生体质健康标准》选测项目评分等级的差异性分析
引用本文:王湧涛,何悦,陈定炫.《学生体质健康标准》选测项目评分等级的差异性分析[J].成都体育学院学报,2006,32(6):98-100.
作者姓名:王湧涛  何悦  陈定炫
作者单位:中国药科大学体育部,江苏,南京,210009
摘    要:以一、二年级的普通大学生为研究对象,对《学生体质健康标准》选测项目的得分和优良等级进行统计学分析,结果显示:男女生在台阶实验与1 000m/800m二选一测试项目上,选测1 000m/800m跑项目在评优良等级上更有利;男女生在坐位体前屈与握力体重指数二选一测试项目上,男生选测握力体重指数更有利,而女生选测坐位体前屈更有利:男女生在立定跳远与50m二选一测试项目上,二者的评优良等级没有显著性差异.

关 键 词:体质  健康  选测项目
文章编号:1001-9154(2006)06-0098-03
收稿时间:2006-09-12
修稿时间:2006-09-12

Study on Marked-rank Difference of Selective Projects in Health Standard of Students' Body Constitution
Wang Yong - tao , et al.Study on Marked-rank Difference of Selective Projects in Health Standard of Students'''' Body Constitution[J].Journal of Chengdu Physical Education Institute,2006,32(6):98-100.
Authors:Wang Yong - tao  
Institution:Department of Physical Education, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangshu 210009
Abstract:Taking freshmen and sophomores as research subjects,the article made a statistics study on market-rank difference of selective projects in health standard of students' body constitution.The results showed: Rank of boys and girls who chose 1000m/800m between bench experiment and 1000m/800m is better;Rank of boys who chose hand strength body weight index between sit-and-reach test and strength body weight index is better.However,rank of girls who chose sit-and-reach test is better;there is no difference between standing long jump and 50m.
Keywords:body constitution  health  selective projects
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号