首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“请输”诉求与锦标主义思潮再审视
引用本文:陈晴.“请输”诉求与锦标主义思潮再审视[J].体育成人教育学刊,2014(3):19-22.
作者姓名:陈晴
作者单位:武汉体育学院体育教育学院,湖北武汉430079
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究基金项目(BVJC890029)
摘    要:近期在武汉举办的亚乒赛,中国选手包揽男女冠亚军。这种令人心潮澎湃的场景,却收获意想不到的社会诉求:"咱能输几场吗?"从哲学和史学观考察,任何事物的存在只是个过程而已,锦标主义也可以视为伴随时代起伏的体育思潮。锦标主义遭到质疑的原因主要有:锦标大国与体质下降的反差;政治为本与以人为本的反差;阶段目标与长远目标的反差。在新的形势和任务统摄下,如何看待请输诉求,又该怎样重新审视锦标主义思潮,值得国人理性思考,以回应社会和国人的"请输"诉求与关切。

关 键 词:“请输”诉求  锦标主义思潮  理性审视

Appeal of Asking for Lose and Championships Ideology
CHEN Qing.Appeal of Asking for Lose and Championships Ideology[J].Journal of Sports Adult Education,2014(3):19-22.
Authors:CHEN Qing
Institution:CHEN Qing (Wuhan Sports Univ. , Wuhan 430079, China)
Abstract:In the recent Asian Table Tennis Contest held in Wuhan, Chinese athletes won the first and second prizes of both men's and women's. However, this glory has met with the social appeal of Can we just lose in a few games? In view of philosophy and history study, all things exist in the course of process and the championship ideology is the sports ideology developing with time. The causes of doubt of championships ideology include contrasts between sport power and physical quality decline, between political orientation and people orientation, between stage goal and long-ferrn goal. In the new circumstances, it should be considered that how to have a clear view of the asking for lose appeal and how to re-examine the championship ideology.
Keywords:appeal of asking for lose  championship ideology  rational reflection
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号