| 国际体育仲裁院仲裁裁决的司法审查 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 单宇,邓春林.国际体育仲裁院仲裁裁决的司法审查[J].武汉体育学院学报,2001,53(12):23-29. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 单宇 邓春林 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 华南农业大学 体育教学研究部, 广东 广州 510640;2. 广东财经大学 体育部, 广东 广州 510320 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目（13BTY034）。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 论述了瑞士联邦法院对国际体育仲裁院（CAS）裁决进行司法审查的一般规定，从撤销或维持CAS裁决的案例等方面，论述了从瑞士联邦法院的司法审查对CAS的影响。以中国、美国、德国等的案例为例，论述了《纽约公约》缔约国对CAS之裁决的司法审查概况。许多CAS仲裁员有丰富的学术背景并接受了较多的仲裁任命。但是，我国乃至亚洲的仲裁员在CAS仲裁员中的比例极低，这是我国体育界和法律界都需要重视的问题，也是CAS要考虑的平衡仲裁员的地域分布问题。"公共政策"没有明确的定义，使得对相关案例裁决的结果难以准确预判。《纽约公约》缔约国众多，难以统一法律规定。作为对CAS仲裁裁决进行司法审查最频繁的国家，瑞士有必要对"公共政策"进行更明确的定义。基于反兴奋剂的严格责任原则，一些无辜的运动员受到了处罚。对于运动员特别是职业运动员来说，这无疑将影响到他们的生计。国际反兴奋剂机构、CAS和包括瑞士在内的国家立法机关都应该考虑改进严格责任规则，严惩兴奋剂事件中的肇事者，豁免对无辜受害者的处罚。
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育法学 体育仲裁 国际体育仲裁院 瑞士联邦法庭 司法审查 纽约公约 体育争端 |
Judicial Review of Arbitration Award of International Court of Arbitration for Sport |
| |
| SHAN Yu,DENG Chunlin.Judicial Review of Arbitration Award of International Court of Arbitration for Sport[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education,2001,53(12):23-29. |
| |
| Authors: | SHAN Yu DENG Chunlin |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Dept. of P. E, South China Agricultural Univ., Guangzhou 510640, China;2. Dept. of P. E, Guangdong Univ. of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper studies the judicial review of the arbitration award of the international court of arbitration for sport. It discusses the general provisions of judicial review of CAS awards by Swiss federal court, and the influence of judicial review of Swiss federal court on CAS from the aspects of cases of revoking or upholding CAS awards. Taking the cases of China, the United States, Germany and so on as examples, this paper discusses the general situation of judicial review of CAS award by states parties to the New York convention. The study concludes that:(1) many CAS arbitrators have rich academic background and accepted many arbitration appointments. However, the proportion of arbitrators in CAS is extremely low in China and even in Asia. This is a problem that China's sports and legal circles need to pay attention to and CAS needs to consider the balance of the geographical distribution of arbitrators. (2) There is no clear definition of "public policy", which makes it difficult to accurately predict the outcome of relevant case decisions. The numerous states parties to the New York convention make it difficult to unify the legal provisions. As the country that conducts the most frequent judicial review of CAS arbitration awards, it is necessary for Switzerland to define "public policy" more clearly. (3) Based on the strict liability principle of anti-doping, some innocent athletes have been punished. For athletes, especially professional athletes, this will undoubtedly affect their livelihood. The international anti-doping agency, CAS and national legislatures, including Switzerland, should consider improving strict liability rules to severely punish those responsible for doping and exempt innocent victims from punishment. |
| |
| Keywords: | sports arbitration International Court of Arbitration for Sport Swiss federal court judicial review New York Convention sports dispute |
|
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《武汉体育学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
