首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

学校体育场馆开放后安全保障义务及不作为侵权责任探析
引用本文:谭仲秋.学校体育场馆开放后安全保障义务及不作为侵权责任探析[J].武汉体育学院学报,2011,45(3).
作者姓名:谭仲秋
作者单位:成都体育学院,思想政治理论课教学部,四川,成都,610041
基金项目:2008年国家体育总局体育社会科学研究项目
摘    要:学校体育场馆开放后发生的问题日益增多,管理者是否履行了安全保障义务,关系到是否承担法律责任.对安全保障义务予以界定,阐释设置安全保障义务的法理依据,着重对违反安全保障义务的消极不作为侵权责任进行分析.违反安全保障义务属于消极的不作为,应在合理限度内对该行为进行否定评价,不应让经营管理者因承担责任而经济上遭受重创.过度的否定将使经营管理者的行动自由受到限制,从而加重学校体育场馆经营管理者的责任,妨碍"学校体育场馆向社会公众开放"政策的贯彻落实.

关 键 词:学校体育场馆  安全保障义务  不作为侵权责任

Security obligations and omission of liability for tort with opening up of school sports venues
TAN Zhong-qiu.Security obligations and omission of liability for tort with opening up of school sports venues[J].Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education,2011,45(3).
Authors:TAN Zhong-qiu
Institution:TAN Zhong-qiu(Chengdu Inst.of P.E.,Chengdu 610041,China)
Abstract:After the schools open their sports venues to the public,problems have emerged.Whether the administrators have fulfilled their security obligations is directly related to whether they are to take relative legal responsibility.Violation of security obligations are omission of liability for tort,which should be negatively assessed within reasonable limit without brining great economic losses to the administrators.Too much negative assessment would over-limit the administrators and hinder the execution of the ...
Keywords:school revenue  security obligation  omission of liability for tort  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号