High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: Implications for exercise adherence |
| |
| Authors: | Jonathan D Bartlett Graeme L Close Don P M MacLaren Warren Gregson Barry Drust |
| |
| Institution: | Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences , Liverpool John Moores University , Liverpool, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract The aim of this study was to objectively quantify ratings of perceived enjoyment using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale following high-intensity interval running versus moderate-intensity continuous running. Eight recreationally active men performed two running protocols consisting of high-intensity interval running (6×3 min at 90% Vdot]O2max interspersed with 6×3 min active recovery at 50% Vdot]O2max with a 7-min warm-up and cool down at 70% Vdot]O2max) or 50 min moderate-intensity continuous running at 70% Vdot]O2max. Ratings of perceived enjoyment after exercise were higher (P < 0.05) following interval running compared with continuous running (88 ± 6 vs. 61 ± 12) despite higher (P < 0.05) ratings of perceived exertion (14 ± 1 vs. 13 ± 1). There was no difference (P < 0.05) in average heart rate (88 ± 3 vs. 87 ± 3% maximum heart rate), average Vdot]O2 (71 ± 6 vs. 73 ± 4%Vdot]O2max), total Vdot]O2 (162 ± 16 vs. 166 ± 27 L) or energy expenditure (811 ± 83 vs. 832 ± 136 kcal) between protocols. The greater enjoyment associated with high-intensity interval running may be relevant for improving exercise adherence, since running is a low-cost exercise intervention requiring no exercise equipment and similar relative exercise intensities have previously induced health benefits in patient populations. |
| |
| Keywords: | Maximal oxygen uptake intermittent exercise endurance training |
|
