首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

北京奥运会仲裁四题
引用本文:黄世席.北京奥运会仲裁四题[J].体育科学,2007,27(9):81-85,91.
作者姓名:黄世席
作者单位:山东大学,法学院,山东,济南,250100
基金项目:国家社会科学基金;司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目
摘    要:北京奥运会期间,国际体育仲裁院要在北京设立一个特别仲裁机构.中国有关体育仲裁立法的缺失不会影响奥运会仲裁的顺利进行,而且,北京奥运会特别仲裁机构可以受理当事人就不服中国奥委会等组织做出的裁决的上诉.由于中国对《承认和执行外国仲裁裁决的纽约公约》的保留,在中国申请承认与执行奥运会仲裁裁决会遇到法律上的麻烦.中国应制定体育仲裁立法并对《承认和执行外国仲裁裁决的纽约公约》提出的保留进行重新审查.

关 键 词:奥运会  29届  国际体育仲裁院  特别仲裁
文章编号:1000-677X(2007)09-0081-05
修稿时间:2007-05-092007-08-08

Research on the Four Questions about Beijing Olympic Games Arbitration
HUANG Shi-xi.Research on the Four Questions about Beijing Olympic Games Arbitration[J].China Sport Science,2007,27(9):81-85,91.
Authors:HUANG Shi-xi
Institution:Law School;Shandong University;Jinan 250100;China.
Abstract:During the Beijing Olympic Games,CAS will establish an ad hoc division in Beijing. The absence of Chinese sports arbitration legislation will not prevent the formal operation of Beijing Olympic Games arbitration and Chinese parties should have the right to challenge Chi- nese Olympic Committee's Olympic-related resolution and appeal them to CAS ad hoc divi- sion.Because China made reservation to New York Convention,so there will be some problems as to the recognition and enforcement of CAS awards in China.China should make its own sports arbitration act and reconsider the reservation to New York Convention.
Keywords:Beijing  Olympic Games  CAS  Olympic Games ad hoc Division
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号